Papers › Early Classification of Time Series: Taxonomy and Benchmark

Early Classification of Time Series: Taxonomy and Benchmark

26 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.18332archive 2025-07-28

Aurélien Renault, Alexis Bondu, Antoine Cornuéjols, Vincent Lemaire

In many situations, the measurements of a studied phenomenon are provided sequentially, and the prediction of its class needs to be made as early as possible so as not to incur too high a time penalty, but not too early and risk paying the cost of misclassification. This problem has been particularly studied in the case of time series, and is known as Early Classification of Time Series (ECTS). Although it has been the subject of a growing body of literature, there is still a lack of a systematic, shared evaluation protocol to compare the relative merits of the various existing methods. This document begins by situating these methods within a principle-based taxonomy. It defines dimensions for organizing their evaluation, and then reports the results of a very extensive set of experiments along these dimensions involving nine state-of-the art ECTS algorithms. In addition, these and other experiments can be carried out using an open-source library in which most of the existing ECTS algorithms have been implemented (see https://github.com/ML-EDM/ml_edm).

PaperPDFCode

Code

ml-edm/ml_edm officialmentioned in paperpytorch report
msd-irimas/multi_comparison_matrix mentioned on GitHubGPL-3.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClassificationEarly ClassificationTime Series

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SET

1 archive method tag without a method page not shown.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections