Papers › DVIS: Decoupled Video Instance Segmentation Framework
DVIS: Decoupled Video Instance Segmentation Framework
6 Jun 2023ICCV 2023 1arXiv:2306.03413archive 2025-07-28
Tao Zhang, Xingye Tian, Yu Wu, Shunping Ji, Xuebo Wang, Yuan Zhang, Pengfei Wan
Video instance segmentation (VIS) is a critical task with diverse applications, including autonomous driving and video editing. Existing methods often underperform on complex and long videos in real world, primarily due to two factors. Firstly, offline methods are limited by the tightly-coupled modeling paradigm, which treats all frames equally and disregards the interdependencies between adjacent frames. Consequently, this leads to the introduction of excessive noise during long-term temporal alignment. Secondly, online methods suffer from inadequate utilization of temporal information. To tackle these challenges, we propose a decoupling strategy for VIS by dividing it into three independent sub-tasks: segmentation, tracking, and refinement. The efficacy of the decoupling strategy relies on two crucial elements: 1) attaining precise long-term alignment outcomes via frame-by-frame association during tracking, and 2) the effective utilization of temporal information predicated on the aforementioned accurate alignment outcomes during refinement. We introduce a novel referring tracker and temporal refiner to construct the \textbf{D}ecoupled \textbf{VIS} framework (\textbf{DVIS}). DVIS achieves new SOTA performance in both VIS and VPS, surpassing the current SOTA methods by 7.3 AP and 9.6 VPQ on the OVIS and VIPSeg datasets, which are the most challenging and realistic benchmarks. Moreover, thanks to the decoupling strategy, the referring tracker and temporal refiner are super light-weight (only 1.69\% of the segmenter FLOPs), allowing for efficient training and inference on a single GPU with 11G memory. The code is available at \href{https://github.com/zhang-tao-whu/DVIS}{https://github.com/zhang-tao-whu/DVIS}.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Offline) |
AP50 |
75.9 |
#5 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Offline) |
AP75 |
53.0 |
#5 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Offline) |
AR1 |
19.4 |
#5 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Offline) |
AR10 |
55.3 |
#5 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Offline) |
mask AP |
49.9 |
#5 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Online) |
AP50 |
71.9 |
#8 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Online) |
AP75 |
49.2 |
#8 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Online) |
AR1 |
19.4 |
#8 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Online) |
AR10 |
52.5 |
#8 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
OVIS validation |
DVIS(Swin-L, Online) |
mask AP |
47.1 |
#8 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS 2021 |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
AP50 |
83.0 |
#8 of 26 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS 2021 |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
AP75 |
68.4 |
#8 of 26 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS 2021 |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
AR1 |
47.7 |
#8 of 26 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS 2021 |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
AR10 |
65.7 |
#8 of 26 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS 2021 |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
mask AP |
60.1 |
#8 of 26 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS validation |
DVIS |
AP50 |
88.0 |
#3 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS validation |
DVIS |
AP75 |
72.7 |
#3 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS validation |
DVIS |
AR1 |
56.5 |
#3 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS validation |
DVIS |
AR10 |
70.3 |
#3 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
YouTube-VIS validation |
DVIS |
mask AP |
64.9 |
#3 of 44 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
Youtube-VIS 2022 Validation |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
AP50_L |
69.0 |
#4 of 7 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
Youtube-VIS 2022 Validation |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
AP75_L |
48.8 |
#4 of 7 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
Youtube-VIS 2022 Validation |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
AR10_L |
51.8 |
#4 of 7 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
Youtube-VIS 2022 Validation |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
AR1_L |
37.2 |
#4 of 7 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Instance Segmentation |
Youtube-VIS 2022 Validation |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
mAP_L |
45.9 |
#4 of 7 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Panoptic Segmentation |
VIPSeg |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
STQ |
55.3 |
#4 of 12 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Panoptic Segmentation |
VIPSeg |
DVIS(Swin-L) |
VPQ |
57.6 |
#4 of 12 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections