Papers › DenseNets Reloaded: Paradigm Shift Beyond ResNets and ViTs
DenseNets Reloaded: Paradigm Shift Beyond ResNets and ViTs
Donghyun Kim, Byeongho Heo, Dongyoon Han
This paper revives Densely Connected Convolutional Networks (DenseNets) and reveals the underrated effectiveness over predominant ResNet-style architectures. We believe DenseNets' potential was overlooked due to untouched training methods and traditional design elements not fully revealing their capabilities. Our pilot study shows dense connections through concatenation are strong, demonstrating that DenseNets can be revitalized to compete with modern architectures. We methodically refine suboptimal components - architectural adjustments, block redesign, and improved training recipes towards widening DenseNets and boosting memory efficiency while keeping concatenation shortcuts. Our models, employing simple architectural elements, ultimately surpass Swin Transformer, ConvNeXt, and DeiT-III - key architectures in the residual learning lineage. Furthermore, our models exhibit near state-of-the-art performance on ImageNet-1K, competing with the very recent models and downstream tasks, ADE20k semantic segmentation, and COCO object detection/instance segmentation. Finally, we provide empirical analyses that uncover the merits of the concatenation over additive shortcuts, steering a renewed preference towards DenseNet-style designs. Our code is available at https://github.com/naver-ai/rdnet.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2403.19588")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · honoured contract.
By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 3 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from naver-ai/rdnet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
410bffb8a07b52e3 · report
50d653ee6a59955c · report
475160c5a1a1225a · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-S (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Accuracy | 94.2% | #51 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-S (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | FLOPS | 8.7G | #51 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-S (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | PARAMS | 50M | #51 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-L (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Accuracy | 94.2% | #52 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-L (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | FLOPS | 34.7G | #52 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-L (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | PARAMS | 186M | #52 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-B (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Accuracy | 94.1% | #53 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-B (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | FLOPS | 15.4G | #53 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-B (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | PARAMS | 87M | #53 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-T (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Accuracy | 93.9% | #59 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-T (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | FLOPS | 5.0G | #59 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | Stanford Cars | RDNet-T (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | PARAMS | 24M | #59 of 83 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | RDNet-L (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Percentage correct | 99.31 | #8 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | RDNet-B (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Percentage correct | 99.31 | #9 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | RDNet-T (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Percentage correct | 98.88 | #28 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-L (384 res) | GFLOPs | 34.7 | #197 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-L (384 res) | Number of params | 186M | #197 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-L (384 res) | Top 1 Accuracy | 85.8% | #197 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-L | GFLOPs | 34.7 | #292 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-L | Number of params | 186M | #292 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-L | Top 1 Accuracy | 84.8% | #292 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-B | GFLOPs | 15.4 | #320 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-B | Number of params | 87M | #320 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-B | Top 1 Accuracy | 84.4% | #320 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-S | GFLOPs | 8.7 | #395 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-S | Number of params | 50M | #395 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-S | Top 1 Accuracy | 83.7% | #395 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-T | GFLOPs | 5.0 | #496 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-T | Number of params | 24M | #496 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RDNet-T | Top 1 Accuracy | 82.8% | #496 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | RDNet-L (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Number of params | 186M | #12 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | RDNet-L (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Top-1 Accuracy | 81.8% | #12 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | RDNet-B (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Number of params | 87M | #16 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | RDNet-B (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Top-1 Accuracy | 80.5 | #16 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | RDNet-S (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Number of params | 50M | #20 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | RDNet-S (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Top-1 Accuracy | 79.1 | #20 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | RDNet-T (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Number of params | 24M | #24 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | RDNet-T (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Top-1 Accuracy | 77.0 | #24 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2019 | RDNet-L (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Number of params | 186M | #5 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2019 | RDNet-L (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Top-1 Accuracy | 83.7 | #5 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2019 | RDNet-B (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Number of params | 87M | #6 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2019 | RDNet-B (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Top-1 Accuracy | 83.5 | #6 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2019 | RDNet-S (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Number of params | 50M | #7 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2019 | RDNet-S (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Top-1 Accuracy | 82.9 | #7 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2019 | RDNet-T (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Number of params | 24M | #11 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2019 | RDNet-T (224 res, IN-1K pretrained) | Top-1 Accuracy | 81.2 | #11 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Introduced by this paper: RDNet
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections