Papers › Deep set conditioned latent representations for action recognition
Deep set conditioned latent representations for action recognition
Akash Singh, Tom De Schepper, Kevin Mets, Peter Hellinckx, Jose Oramas, Steven Latre
In recent years multi-label, multi-class video action recognition has gained significant popularity. While reasoning over temporally connected atomic actions is mundane for intelligent species, standard artificial neural networks (ANN) still struggle to classify them. In the real world, atomic actions often temporally connect to form more complex composite actions. The challenge lies in recognising composite action of varying durations while other distinct composite or atomic actions occur in the background. Drawing upon the success of relational networks, we propose methods that learn to reason over the semantic concept of objects and actions. We empirically show how ANNs benefit from pretraining, relational inductive biases and unordered set-based latent representations. In this paper we propose deep set conditioned I3D (SCI3D), a two stream relational network that employs latent representation of state and visual representation for reasoning over events and actions. They learn to reason about temporally connected actions in order to identify all of them in the video. The proposed method achieves an improvement of around 1.49% mAP in atomic action recognition and 17.57% mAP in composite action recognition, over a I3D-NL baseline, on the CATER dataset.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atomic action recognition | CATER | SCI3D | Average-mAP | 96.77 | #1 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Atomic action recognition | CATER | R3D-NL | Average-mAP | 95.28 | #2 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Atomic action recognition | CATER | Single stream SCI3D | Average-mAP | 91.82 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Atomic action recognition | CATER | FasterRCNN | Average-mAP | 63.85 | #4 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Composite action recognition | CATER | Single stream SCI3D | Average-mAP | 69.76 | #1 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Composite action recognition | CATER | SCI3D | Average-mAP | 66.71 | #2 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Composite action recognition | CATER | R3D-NL | Average-mAP | 52.19 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Composite action recognition | CATER | FasterRCNN | Average-mAP | 25.45 | #4 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections