Papers › Deep Multi-instance Networks with Sparse Label Assignment for Whole Mammogram Classification
Deep Multi-instance Networks with Sparse Label Assignment for Whole Mammogram Classification
Wentao Zhu, Qi Lou, Yeeleng Scott Vang, Xiaohui Xie
Mammogram classification is directly related to computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer. Traditional methods rely on regions of interest (ROIs) which require great efforts to annotate. Inspired by the success of using deep convolutional features for natural image analysis and multi-instance learning (MIL) for labeling a set of instances/patches, we propose end-to-end trained deep multi-instance networks for mass classification based on whole mammogram without the aforementioned ROIs. We explore three different schemes to construct deep multi-instance networks for whole mammogram classification. Experimental results on the INbreast dataset demonstrate the robustness of proposed networks compared to previous work using segmentation and detection annotations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspicous (BIRADS 4,5)-no suspicous (BIRADS 1,2,3) per image classification | InBreast | AlexNet+Sparse MIL INbr. Auto. | AUC | 0.89 | #9 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Suspicous (BIRADS 4,5)-no suspicous (BIRADS 1,2,3) per image classification | InBreast | AlexNet+Label Assign. MIL INbr. Auto. | AUC | 0.84 | #12 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Suspicous (BIRADS 4,5)-no suspicous (BIRADS 1,2,3) per image classification | InBreast | AlexNet+Max Pooling MIL | AUC | 0.83 | #14 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Suspicous (BIRADS 4,5)-no suspicous (BIRADS 1,2,3) per image classification | InBreast | AlexNet | AUC | 0.79 | #15 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections