Papers › CUNY Systems for the Query-by-Example Search on Speech Task at MediaEval 2015

CUNY Systems for the Query-by-Example Search on Speech Task at MediaEval 2015

14 Sep 2015MediaEval 2015 Workshop 2015 9archive 2025-07-28

Min Ma, Andrew Rosenberg

This paper describes two query-by-example systems developed by Speech Lab, Queens College (CUNY). Our systems aimed to respond with quick search results from the selected reference files. Three phonetic recognizers (Czech, Hungarian and Russian) were utilized to get phoneme sequences of both query and reference speech files. Each query sequence were compared with all the reference sequences using both global and local aligners. In the first system, we predicted the most probable reference files based on the sequence alignment results; In the second system, we pruned out the subsequences from the reference sequences that yielded best local symbolic alignments, then 39-dimension MFCC features were extracted for both query and the subsequences. Both the two systems employed an optimized DTW, and obtained Cnxe of 0.9989 and 1.0674 on the test data respectively.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Keyword Spotting

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [SMO+iSAX] (dev) ATWV 0.0011 #49 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [SMO+iSAX] (dev) Cnxe 0.9988 #49 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [SMO+iSAX] (dev) MTWV 0.0067 #49 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [SMO+iSAX] (dev) MinCnxe 0.9872 #49 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [SMO+iSAX] (eval) ATWV 0.0006 #50 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [SMO+iSAX] (eval) Cnxe 0.9989 #50 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [SMO+iSAX] (eval) MTWV 0.0010 #50 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [SMO+iSAX] (eval) MinCnxe 0.9870 #50 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [Subseq+MFCC] (dev) ATWV -3.9820 #53 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [Subseq+MFCC] (dev) Cnxe 1.0658 #53 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [Subseq+MFCC] (dev) MTWV 0.0123 #53 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [Subseq+MFCC] (dev) MinCnxe 0.9823 #53 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [Subseq+MFCC] (eval) ATWV -4.0205 #54 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [Subseq+MFCC] (eval) Cnxe 1.0674 #54 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [Subseq+MFCC] (eval) MTWV 0.0006 #54 of 69 Archive leaderboard report
Keyword Spotting QUESST CUNY [Subseq+MFCC] (eval) MinCnxe 0.9853 #54 of 69 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections