Papers › Revisiting Classification Perspective on Scene Text Recognition
Revisiting Classification Perspective on Scene Text Recognition
Hongxiang Cai, Jun Sun, Yichao Xiong
The prevalent perspectives of scene text recognition are from sequence to sequence (seq2seq) and segmentation. Nevertheless, the former is composed of many components which makes implementation and deployment complicated, while the latter requires character level annotations that is expensive. In this paper, we revisit classification perspective that models scene text recognition as an image classification problem. Classification perspective has a simple pipeline and only needs word level annotations. We revive classification perspective by devising a scene text recognition model named as CSTR, which performs as well as methods from other perspectives. The CSTR model consists of CPNet (classification perspective network) and SPPN (separated conv with global average pooling prediction network). CSTR is as simple as image classification model like ResNet \cite{he2016deep} which makes it easy to implement and deploy. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the classification perspective on scene text recognition with extensive experiments. Futhermore, CSTR achieves nearly state-of-the-art performance on six public benchmarks including regular text, irregular text. The code will be available at https://github.com/Media-Smart/vedastr.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scene Text Recognition | ICDAR 2003 | CSTR | Accuracy | 94.8 | #6 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Scene Text Recognition | ICDAR2013 | CSTR | Accuracy | 93.2 | #26 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Scene Text Recognition | ICDAR2015 | CSTR | Accuracy | 81.6 | #16 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Scene Text Recognition | SVT | CSTR | Accuracy | 90.6 | #24 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections