Papers › Convolutional Neural Networks Based Remote Sensing Scene Classification under Clear...
Convolutional Neural Networks Based Remote Sensing Scene Classification under Clear and Cloudy Environments
Huiming Sun1, Yuewei Lin2, Qin Zou3, Shaoyue Song4, Jianwu Fang5, Hongkai Yu1∗
Remote sensing (RS) scene classification has wide ap- plications in the environmental monitoring and geological survey. In the real-world applications, the RS scene images taken by the satellite might have two scenarios: clear and cloudy environments. However, most of existing methods did not consider these two environments simultaneously. In this paper, we assume that the global and local features are discriminative in either clear or cloudy environments. Many existing Convolution Neural Networks (CNN) based models have made excellent achievements in the image classifica- tion, however they somewhat ignored the global and local features in their network structure. In this paper, we pro- pose a new CNN based network (named GLNet) with the Global Encoder and Local Encoder to extract the discrim- inative global and local features for the RS scene classifi- cation, where the constraints for inter-class dispersion and intra-class compactness are embedded in the GLNet train- ing. The experimental results on two publicized RS scene classification datasets show that the proposed GLNet could achieve better performance based on many existing CNN backbones under both clear and cloudy environments.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | RSSCN7 | GLNet | 1:1 Accuracy | 95.07 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections