Papers › Compacting, Picking and Growing for Unforgetting Continual Learning

Compacting, Picking and Growing for Unforgetting Continual Learning

15 Oct 2019NeurIPS 2019 12arXiv:1910.06562archive 2025-07-28

Steven C. Y. Hung, Cheng-Hao Tu, Cheng-En Wu, Chien-Hung Chen, Yi-Ming Chan, Chu-Song Chen

Continual lifelong learning is essential to many applications. In this paper, we propose a simple but effective approach to continual deep learning. Our approach leverages the principles of deep model compression, critical weights selection, and progressive networks expansion. By enforcing their integration in an iterative manner, we introduce an incremental learning method that is scalable to the number of sequential tasks in a continual learning process. Our approach is easy to implement and owns several favorable characteristics. First, it can avoid forgetting (i.e., learn new tasks while remembering all previous tasks). Second, it allows model expansion but can maintain the model compactness when handling sequential tasks. Besides, through our compaction and selection/expansion mechanism, we show that the knowledge accumulated through learning previous tasks is helpful to build a better model for the new tasks compared to training the models independently with tasks. Experimental results show that our approach can incrementally learn a deep model tackling multiple tasks without forgetting, while the model compactness is maintained with the performance more satisfiable than individual task training.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1910.06562")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 4 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ivclab/CPG officialmentioned in paperpytorchBSD-3-Clause report
p0werweirdo/tagfcl mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2unverified

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

conv1x1 ivclab/CPG/packnet_models/resnet.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · d9def42110729a85 · report
conv3x3 ivclab/CPG/packnet_models/resnet.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · 160bb14bd76201b4 · report
resnet18 ivclab/CPG/packnet_models/resnet.py official repository unverified BSD-3-Clause (permissive) · f12377e78b0616c2 · report
resnet_block p0werweirdo/tagfcl/src/models/ServerModel.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · ffcfd7be7fccf20c · report

Tasks

Age And Gender ClassificationContinual LearningFace VerificationFacial Expression Recognition (FER)Incremental LearningLifelong learningModel Compression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Age And Gender Classification Adience Age CPG (single crop, pytorch) Accuracy (5-fold) 57.66 #10 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Age And Gender Classification Adience Gender CPG (single crop, pytorch) Accuracy (5-fold) 89.66 #5 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Continual Learning CUBS (Fine-grained 6 Tasks) CPG Accuracy 83.59 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Continual Learning Cifar100 (20 tasks) CPG Average Accuracy 80.9 #5 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Continual Learning Flowers (Fine-grained 6 Tasks) CPG Accuracy 96.62 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Continual Learning ImageNet (Fine-grained 6 Tasks) CPG Accuracy 75.81 #4 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Continual Learning Sketch (Fine-grained 6 Tasks) CPG Accuracy 80.33 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Continual Learning Stanford Cars (Fine-grained 6 Tasks) CPG Accuracy 92.80 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Continual Learning Wikiart (Fine-grained 6 Tasks) CPG Accuracy 77.15 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Facial Expression Recognition (FER) AffectNet CPG Accuracy (7 emotion) 63.57 #47 of 50 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections