Papers › Commonly Uncommon: Semantic Sparsity in Situation Recognition
Commonly Uncommon: Semantic Sparsity in Situation Recognition
Mark Yatskar, Vicente Ordonez, Luke Zettlemoyer, Ali Farhadi
Semantic sparsity is a common challenge in structured visual classification problems; when the output space is complex, the vast majority of the possible predictions are rarely, if ever, seen in the training set. This paper studies semantic sparsity in situation recognition, the task of producing structured summaries of what is happening in images, including activities, objects and the roles objects play within the activity. For this problem, we find empirically that most object-role combinations are rare, and current state-of-the-art models significantly underperform in this sparse data regime. We avoid many such errors by (1) introducing a novel tensor composition function that learns to share examples across role-noun combinations and (2) semantically augmenting our training data with automatically gathered examples of rarely observed outputs using web data. When integrated within a complete CRF-based structured prediction model, the tensor-based approach outperforms existing state of the art by a relative improvement of 2.11% and 4.40% on top-5 verb and noun-role accuracy, respectively. Adding 5 million images with our semantic augmentation techniques gives further relative improvements of 6.23% and 9.57% on top-5 verb and noun-role accuracy.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | CRF + Aug | Top-1 Verb | 34.12 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | CRF + Aug | Top-1 Verb & Value | 26.45 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | CRF + Aug | Top-5 Verbs | 62.59 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Grounded Situation Recognition | SWiG | CRF + Aug | Top-5 Verbs & Value | 46.88 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Situation Recognition | imSitu | CRF + Aug | Top-1 Verb | 34.12 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Situation Recognition | imSitu | CRF + Aug | Top-1 Verb & Value | 26.45 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Situation Recognition | imSitu | CRF + Aug | Top-5 Verbs | 62.59 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Situation Recognition | imSitu | CRF + Aug | Top-5 Verbs & Value | 46.88 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections