Papers › CN-Motifs Perceptive Graph Neural Networks

CN-Motifs Perceptive Graph Neural Networks

15 Nov 2021IEEE Access 2021 11archive 2025-07-28

Fan Zhang, Tian-Ming Bu

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been the dominant approaches for graph representation learning. However, most GNNs are applied to homophily graphs and perform poorly on heterophily graphs. Meanwhile, these GNNs fail to directly capture long-range dependencies and complex interactions between 1-hop neighbors when generating node representations by iteratively aggregating directly connected neighbors. In addition, structural patterns, such as motifs which have been established as building blocks for graph structure, contain rich topological and semantical information and are worth studying further. In this paper, we introduce the common-neighbors based motifs, which we called CN-motifs, to generalize and enrich the definition of structural patterns. We group the 1-hop neighbors and construct a high-order graph according to CN-motifs, and propose CN-motifs Perceptive Graph Neural Networks (CNMPGNN), a novel framework which can effectively resolve problems mentioned above. Notably, by making full use of structural patterns, our model achieves the state-of-the-art results on several homophily and heterophily datasets.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Graph Representation LearningNode ClassificationRepresentation Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Node Classification Actor CNMPGNN Accuracy 36.25 ± 0.98 #37 of 62 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Chameleon CNMPGNN Accuracy 73.29±1.29 #20 of 61 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Citeseer CNMPGNN Accuracy 76.81±1.40 #10 of 71 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Cora CNMPGNN Accuracy 88.20±1.22% #11 of 73 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Cornell CNMPGNN Accuracy 82.38 ± 6.13 #37 of 60 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Pubmed CNMPGNN Accuracy 90.07± 0.43 #8 of 70 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Squirrel CNMPGNN Accuracy 63.60±1.96 #18 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Texas CNMPGNN Accuracy 85.68±5.28 #27 of 62 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification Wisconsin CNMPGNN Accuracy 86.63 ± 3.57 #36 of 63 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections