Papers › Cervical Cytology Classification Using PCA & GWO Enhanced Deep Features Selection
Cervical Cytology Classification Using PCA & GWO Enhanced Deep Features Selection
Hritam Basak, Rohit Kundu, Sukanta Chakraborty, Nibaran Das
Cervical cancer is one of the most deadly and common diseases among women worldwide. It is completely curable if diagnosed in an early stage, but the tedious and costly detection procedure makes it unviable to conduct population-wise screening. Thus, to augment the effort of the clinicians, in this paper, we propose a fully automated framework that utilizes Deep Learning and feature selection using evolutionary optimization for cytology image classification. The proposed framework extracts Deep feature from several Convolution Neural Network models and uses a two-step feature reduction approach to ensure reduction in computation cost and faster convergence. The features extracted from the CNN models form a large feature space whose dimensionality is reduced using Principal Component Analysis while preserving 99% of the variance. A non-redundant, optimal feature subset is selected from this feature space using an evolutionary optimization algorithm, the Grey Wolf Optimizer, thus improving the classification performance. Finally, the selected feature subset is used to train an SVM classifier for generating the final predictions. The proposed framework is evaluated on three publicly available benchmark datasets: Mendeley Liquid Based Cytology (4-class) dataset, Herlev Pap Smear (7-class) dataset, and the SIPaKMeD Pap Smear (5-class) dataset achieving classification accuracies of 99.47%, 98.32% and 97.87% respectively, thus justifying the reliability of the approach. The relevant codes for the proposed approach can be found in: https://github.com/DVLP-CMATERJU/Two-Step-Feature-Enhancement
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | HErlev | DL+PCA+GWO | Accuracy | 98.32 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | SIPaKMeD | DL+PCA+GWO | Accuracy | 97.87 | #1 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections