Papers › Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training...
Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selection
Shifeng Zhang, Cheng Chi, Yongqiang Yao, Zhen Lei, Stan Z. Li
Object detection has been dominated by anchor-based detectors for several years. Recently, anchor-free detectors have become popular due to the proposal of FPN and Focal Loss. In this paper, we first point out that the essential difference between anchor-based and anchor-free detection is actually how to define positive and negative training samples, which leads to the performance gap between them. If they adopt the same definition of positive and negative samples during training, there is no obvious difference in the final performance, no matter regressing from a box or a point. This shows that how to select positive and negative training samples is important for current object detectors. Then, we propose an Adaptive Training Sample Selection (ATSS) to automatically select positive and negative samples according to statistical characteristics of object. It significantly improves the performance of anchor-based and anchor-free detectors and bridges the gap between them. Finally, we discuss the necessity of tiling multiple anchors per location on the image to detect objects. Extensive experiments conducted on MS COCO support our aforementioned analysis and conclusions. With the newly introduced ATSS, we improve state-of-the-art detectors by a large margin to 50.7% AP without introducing any overhead. The code is available at https://github.com/sfzhang15/ATSS
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1912.02424")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 4 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 4 samples from 2 repositories, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
13 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
abd2ab591583348b · report
9109cf95d96cd527 · report
7e6b0e08cb2a4608 · report
74bdc4124307cc00 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | ATSS (ResNetXt-64x4d-101+DCN,multi-scale) | AP50 | 68.9 | #86 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | ATSS (ResNetXt-64x4d-101+DCN,multi-scale) | AP75 | 56.3 | #86 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | ATSS (ResNetXt-64x4d-101+DCN,multi-scale) | APL | 62.4 | #86 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | ATSS (ResNetXt-64x4d-101+DCN,multi-scale) | APM | 52.9 | #86 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | ATSS (ResNetXt-64x4d-101+DCN,multi-scale) | APS | 33.2 | #86 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO test-dev | ATSS (ResNetXt-64x4d-101+DCN,multi-scale) | box mAP | 50.7 | #86 of 225 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO-O | ATSS (ResNet-50) | Average mAP | 16.8 | #37 of 45 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Detection | COCO-O | ATSS (ResNet-50) | Effective Robustness | -0.91 | #37 of 45 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections