Papers › AutoTrust: Benchmarking Trustworthiness in Large Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving

AutoTrust: Benchmarking Trustworthiness in Large Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving

19 Dec 2024arXiv:2412.15206archive 2025-07-28

Shuo Xing, Hongyuan Hua, Xiangbo Gao, Shenzhe Zhu, Renjie Li, Kexin Tian, Xiaopeng Li, Heng Huang, Tianbao Yang, Zhangyang Wang, Yang Zhou, Huaxiu Yao, Zhengzhong Tu

Recent advancements in large vision language models (VLMs) tailored for autonomous driving (AD) have shown strong scene understanding and reasoning capabilities, making them undeniable candidates for end-to-end driving systems. However, limited work exists on studying the trustworthiness of DriveVLMs -- a critical factor that directly impacts public transportation safety. In this paper, we introduce AutoTrust, a comprehensive trustworthiness benchmark for large vision-language models in autonomous driving (DriveVLMs), considering diverse perspectives -- including trustfulness, safety, robustness, privacy, and fairness. We constructed the largest visual question-answering dataset for investigating trustworthiness issues in driving scenarios, comprising over 10k unique scenes and 18k queries. We evaluated six publicly available VLMs, spanning from generalist to specialist, from open-source to commercial models. Our exhaustive evaluations have unveiled previously undiscovered vulnerabilities of DriveVLMs to trustworthiness threats. Specifically, we found that the general VLMs like LLaVA-v1.6 and GPT-4o-mini surprisingly outperform specialized models fine-tuned for driving in terms of overall trustworthiness. DriveVLMs like DriveLM-Agent are particularly vulnerable to disclosing sensitive information. Additionally, both generalist and specialist VLMs remain susceptible to adversarial attacks and struggle to ensure unbiased decision-making across diverse environments and populations. Our findings call for immediate and decisive action to address the trustworthiness of DriveVLMs -- an issue of critical importance to public safety and the welfare of all citizens relying on autonomous transportation systems. Our benchmark is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/taco-group/AutoTrust}, and the leaderboard is released at \url{https://taco-group.github.io/AutoTrust/}.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2412.15206")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 10 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

taco-group/autotrust officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
1ran
8unverified

Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from taco-group/autotrust. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

encode_image taco-group/autotrust/utils.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · f41cb1a19b154297 · report
get_content_type taco-group/autotrust/Dolphins/inference.py official repository ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3614ed4764f65f90 · report
add_gaussian_noise taco-group/autotrust/src/noise_add.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · ad7192037ac896ef · report
construct_open_end_qa taco-group/autotrust/utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 870e26fdc30697d9 · report
extract_frames taco-group/autotrust/Dolphins/inference.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · e67e2f749d91037b · report
get_conv_template taco-group/autotrust/Dolphins/conversation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · dbbd17a289ba66a6 · report
get_image taco-group/autotrust/Dolphins/inference.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 4aa119881c0ba0a5 · report
get_image taco-group/autotrust/Dolphins/inference_image.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2baad8535868b50e · report
get_model_inputs taco-group/autotrust/Dolphins/inference_image.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 0d998bc8a5a07450 · report
query_gpt4 taco-group/autotrust/utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 5b333dc16d40d540 · report

Tasks

Autonomous DrivingBenchmarkingFairnessQuestion AnsweringScene UnderstandingVisual Question Answering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections