Papers › ATOM: Accurate Tracking by Overlap Maximization
ATOM: Accurate Tracking by Overlap Maximization
Martin Danelljan, Goutam Bhat, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Michael Felsberg
While recent years have witnessed astonishing improvements in visual tracking robustness, the advancements in tracking accuracy have been limited. As the focus has been directed towards the development of powerful classifiers, the problem of accurate target state estimation has been largely overlooked. In fact, most trackers resort to a simple multi-scale search in order to estimate the target bounding box. We argue that this approach is fundamentally limited since target estimation is a complex task, requiring high-level knowledge about the object. We address this problem by proposing a novel tracking architecture, consisting of dedicated target estimation and classification components. High level knowledge is incorporated into the target estimation through extensive offline learning. Our target estimation component is trained to predict the overlap between the target object and an estimated bounding box. By carefully integrating target-specific information, our approach achieves previously unseen bounding box accuracy. We further introduce a classification component that is trained online to guarantee high discriminative power in the presence of distractors. Our final tracking framework sets a new state-of-the-art on five challenging benchmarks. On the new large-scale TrackingNet dataset, our tracker ATOM achieves a relative gain of 15% over the previous best approach, while running at over 30 FPS. Code and models are available at https://github.com/visionml/pytracking.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1811.07628")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 6 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 9 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
9 samples harvested; 3 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from xuefeng-zhu5/cdaat. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e0a06ded5d4f6c3c · report
40c655a7fe309e49 · report
b48a27604b9574e0 · report
ce98e7db9de27859 · report
8e3a5839c7c54607 · report
e857124b392e7d82 · report
604be06d5f714be8 · report
5c8f207cb5f19197 · report
2c47f808b8359c8f · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Tracking | FE108 | ATOM | Averaged Precision | 71.3 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Object Tracking | FE108 | ATOM | Success Rate | 46.5 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Object Tracking | GOT-10k | ATOM | Average Overlap | 61.0 | #41 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Object Tracking | GOT-10k | ATOM | Success Rate 0.5 | 74.2 | #41 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Object Tracking | LaSOT | ATOM | AUC | 51.4 | #44 of 46 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Object Tracking | LaSOT | ATOM | Normalized Precision | 57.6 | #44 of 46 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Object Tracking | LaSOT | ATOM | Precision | 50.5 | #44 of 46 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Object Tracking | TrackingNet | ATOM | Accuracy | 70.34 | #33 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Object Tracking | TrackingNet | ATOM | Normalized Precision | 77.11 | #33 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Object Tracking | TrackingNet | ATOM | Precision | 64.84 | #33 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections