Papers › COVTrack++: Learning Open-Vocabulary Multi-Object Tracking from Continuous Videos via...
COVTrack++: Learning Open-Vocabulary Multi-Object Tracking from Continuous Videos via a Synergistic Paradigm
Zekun Qian, Wei Feng, Ruize Han, Junhui Hou
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Multi-Object Tracking (MOT) has traditionally focused on a few specific categories, restricting its applicability to real-world scenarios involving diverse objects. Open-Vocabulary Multi-Object Tracking (OVMOT) addresses this by enabling tracking of arbitrary categories, including novel objects unseen during training. However, current progress is constrained by two challenges: the lack of continuously annotated video data for training, and the lack of a customized OVMOT framework to synergistically handle detection and association. We address the data bottleneck by constructing C-TAO, the first continuously annotated training set for OVMOT, which increases annotation density by 26x over the original TAO and captures smooth motion dynamics and intermediate object states. For the framework bottleneck, we propose COVTrack++, a synergistic framework that achieves a bidirectional reciprocal mechanism between detection and association through three modules: (1) Multi-Cue Adaptive Fusion (MCF) dynamically balances appearance, motion, and semantic cues for association feature learning; (2) Multi-Granularity Hierarchical Aggregation (MGA) exploits hierarchical spatial relationships in dense detections, where visible child nodes (e.g., object parts) assist occluded parent objects (e.g., whole body) for association feature enhancement; (3) Temporal Confidence Propagation (TCP) recovers flickering detections through high-confidence tracked objects boosting low-confidence candidates across frames, stabilizing trajectories. Extensive experiments on TAO demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, with novel TETA reaching 35.4% and 30.5% on validation and test sets, improving novel AssocA by 4.8% and novel LocA by 5.8% over previous methods, and show strong zero-shot generalization on BDD100K.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.24016")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 4 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from zekunqian/covtrack. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
70fa1732cf6a9695 · report
23d845075682b1e8 · report
cd7eff5270a7a400 · report
3ff115cf03a282e3 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.24016, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections