Papers › SLNet: A Super-Lightweight Geometry-Adaptive Network for 3D Point Cloud Recognition
SLNet: A Super-Lightweight Geometry-Adaptive Network for 3D Point Cloud Recognition
Mohammad Saeid, Amir Salarpour, Pedram MohajerAnsari, Mert D. Pesé
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
We present SLNet, a lightweight backbone for 3D point cloud recognition designed to achieve strong performance without the computational cost of many recent attention, graph, and deep MLP based models. The model is built on two simple ideas: NAPE (Nonparametric Adaptive Point Embedding), which captures spatial structure using a combination of Gaussian RBF and cosine bases with input adaptive bandwidth and blending, and GMU (Geometric Modulation Unit), a per channel affine modulator that adds only 2D learnable parameters. These components are used within a four stage hierarchical encoder with FPS+kNN grouping, nonparametric normalization, and shared residual MLPs. In experiments, SLNet shows that a very small model can still remain highly competitive across several 3D recognition tasks. On ModelNet40, SLNet-S with 0.14M parameters and 0.31 GFLOPs achieves 93.64% overall accuracy, outperforming PointMLP-elite with 5x fewer parameters, while SLNet-M with 0.55M parameters and 1.22 GFLOPs reaches 93.92%, exceeding PointMLP with 24x fewer parameters. On ScanObjectNN, SLNet-M achieves 84.25% overall accuracy within 1.2 percentage points of PointMLP while using 28x fewer parameters. For large scale scene segmentation, SLNet-T extends the backbone with local Point Transformer attention and reaches 58.2% mIoU on S3DIS Area 5 with only 2.5M parameters, more than 17x fewer than Point Transformer V3. We also introduce NetScore+, which extends NetScore by incorporating latency and peak memory so that efficiency can be evaluated in a more deployment oriented way. Across multiple benchmarks and hardware settings, SLNet delivers a strong overall balance between accuracy and efficiency. Code is available at: https://github.com/m-saeid/SLNet.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.07454")
Code
Syntology Ran 6 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 9 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
9 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 9 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from m-saeid/SLNet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
6fa55fa6643ab280 · report
d14385254aabc19b · report
f8dc9daf15a32ba4 · report
bd62d3e5697a5569 · report
669c4efc9ce03507 · report
bb227ea09b0a6992 · report
66cb10489b09238f · report
7d2b3a9a450c93e1 · report
d5c9edd26f829c31 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.07454, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections