Papers › ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition
ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition
Jiankang Deng, Jia Guo, Jing Yang, Niannan Xue, Irene Kotsia, Stefanos Zafeiriou
Recently, a popular line of research in face recognition is adopting margins in the well-established softmax loss function to maximize class separability. In this paper, we first introduce an Additive Angular Margin Loss (ArcFace), which not only has a clear geometric interpretation but also significantly enhances the discriminative power. Since ArcFace is susceptible to the massive label noise, we further propose sub-center ArcFace, in which each class contains K sub-centers and training samples only need to be close to any of the K positive sub-centers. Sub-center ArcFace encourages one dominant sub-class that contains the majority of clean faces and non-dominant sub-classes that include hard or noisy faces. Based on this self-propelled isolation, we boost the performance through automatically purifying raw web faces under massive real-world noise. Besides discriminative feature embedding, we also explore the inverse problem, mapping feature vectors to face images. Without training any additional generator or discriminator, the pre-trained ArcFace model can generate identity-preserved face images for both subjects inside and outside the training data only by using the network gradient and Batch Normalization (BN) priors. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ArcFace can enhance the discriminative feature embedding as well as strengthen the generative face synthesis.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1801.07698")
Code
Syntology Ran 16 of 21 code samples harvested from 9 repositories linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 7 ran · our draft was wrong; 7 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 15 samples from 9 repositories, 11 ran; 6 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
100 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
21 samples harvested; 16 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 14 of the 21 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 9 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
9348919b3a8be935 · report
64b45da43b8ab573 · report
5f529c4af000c070 · report
f67f5f081381cc8a · report
c2ce20a5d37df6c4 · report
eddb4fc2f9316aa0 · report
151ad8cf4f442cf0 · report
c2a17396e5b1b237 · report
bd8fb5c95fa87652 · report
bb357f89cac141ff · report
29507ad0ee182d8c · report
dae42d7f4d41b99b · report
e984e4da60619384 · report
d5488fceeb40dc51 · report
5b24fc008e2c830a · report
f975336b5d5f1a80 · report
db4008738f6c3eae · report
c7c89ea2508beb10 · report
fac5364e2f53c6db · report
2da848988b60d9cc · report
897480715a729925 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face Identification | MegaFace | ArcFace + MS1MV2 + R100 + R | Accuracy | 98.35% | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Identification | Trillion Pairs Dataset | Arc-Softmax | Accuracy | 57.48 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Recognition | CASIA-WebFace+masks | ArcFace | Accuracy | 87.95 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Recognition | CelebA+masks | ArcFace | Accuracy | 91.78 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Verification | IJB-C | ArcFace | TAR @ FAR=1e-5 | 96.07% | #6 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Verification | IJB-C | ArcFace | model | R100 | #6 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Verification | IJB-C | ArcFace | training dataset | IBUG-500K | #6 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Verification | Labeled Faces in the Wild | ArcFace + MS1MV2 + R100, | Accuracy | 99.83% | #1 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Verification | MegaFace | ArcFace + MS1MV2 + R100 + R | Accuracy | 98.48% | #4 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Verification | Trillion Pairs Dataset | Arc-Softmax | Accuracy | 57.45 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Verification | YouTube Faces DB | ArcFace + MS1MV2 + R100, | Accuracy | 98.02% | #2 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Introduced by this paper: ArcFace
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections