Papers › On the Arbitrary-Oriented Object Detection: Classification based Approaches Revisited

On the Arbitrary-Oriented Object Detection: Classification based Approaches Revisited

12 Mar 2020ECCV 2020 8arXiv:2003.05597archive 2025-07-28

Xue Yang, Junchi Yan

Arbitrary-oriented object detection has been a building block for rotation sensitive tasks. We first show that the boundary problem suffered in existing dominant regression-based rotation detectors, is caused by angular periodicity or corner ordering, according to the parameterization protocol. We also show that the root cause is that the ideal predictions can be out of the defined range. Accordingly, we transform the angular prediction task from a regression problem to a classification one. For the resulting circularly distributed angle classification problem, we first devise a Circular Smooth Label technique to handle the periodicity of angle and increase the error tolerance to adjacent angles. To reduce the excessive model parameters by Circular Smooth Label, we further design a Densely Coded Labels, which greatly reduces the length of the encoding. Finally, we further develop an object heading detection module, which can be useful when the exact heading orientation information is needed e.g. for ship and plane heading detection. We release our OHD-SJTU dataset and OHDet detector for heading detection. Extensive experimental results on three large-scale public datasets for aerial images i.e. DOTA, HRSC2016, OHD-SJTU, and face dataset FDDB, as well as scene text dataset ICDAR2015 and MLT, show the effectiveness of our approach.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2003.05597")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

SJTU-Thinklab-Det/OHDet_Tensorflow officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report
Thinklab-SJTU/CSL_RetinaNet_Tensorflow officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report
yangxue0827/RotationDetection officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report
hukaixuan19970627/yolov5_obb mentioned on GitHubpytorchGPL-3.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from SJTU-Thinklab-Det/OHDet_Tensorflow. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_gtboxes_head_and_label SJTU-Thinklab-Det/OHDet_Tensorflow/tools/multi_gpu_train_r3det_csl_ohdet.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 60d367be4e8c78e6 · report
parse_gt SJTU-Thinklab-Det/OHDet_Tensorflow/eval_devkit/OHD_SJTU_evaluation_OHD.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · d397be7581873353 · report
voc_ap SJTU-Thinklab-Det/OHDet_Tensorflow/eval_devkit/OHD_SJTU_evaluation_OHD.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it no licence file found · pointer only · 1c679c88d3cb7b6e · report
get_gtboxes_and_label identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · b07dc7faf9668206 · report

Tasks

ClassificationGeneral ClassificationObject DetectionObject Detection In Aerial ImagesOriented Object Detectionobject-detectionregression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Object Detection In Aerial Images DOTA CSL mAP 76.17% #43 of 58 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Introduced by this paper: CSL

CSL

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections