Papers › ANDHRA Bandersnatch: Training Neural Networks to Predict Parallel Realities

ANDHRA Bandersnatch: Training Neural Networks to Predict Parallel Realities

28 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.19213archive 2025-07-28

Venkata Satya Sai Ajay Daliparthi

Inspired by the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI), this work introduces a novel neural network architecture that splits the same input signal into parallel branches at each layer, utilizing a Hyper Rectified Activation, referred to as ANDHRA. The branched layers do not merge and form separate network paths, leading to multiple network heads for output prediction. For a network with a branching factor of 2 at three levels, the total number of heads is 2^3 = 8 . The individual heads are jointly trained by combining their respective loss values. However, the proposed architecture requires additional parameters and memory during training due to the additional branches. During inference, the experimental results on CIFAR-10/100 demonstrate that there exists one individual head that outperforms the baseline accuracy, achieving statistically significant improvement with equal parameters and computational cost.

PaperPDFCode

Code

dvssajay/New_World officialpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Image Classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification CIFAR-10 ABNet-2G-R3-Combined Percentage correct 96.378 #115 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 ABNet-2G-R3 Percentage correct 96.088 #121 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 ABNet-2G-R2 Percentage correct 95.900 #125 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 ABNet-2G-R1 Percentage correct 95.536 #131 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 ABNet-2G-R0 Percentage correct 94.118 #163 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 ABNet-2G-R3-Combined Percentage correct 82.784 #97 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 ABNet-2G-R3 Percentage correct 80.830 #124 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 ABNet-2G-R2 Percentage correct 80.354 #128 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 ABNet-2G-R1 Percentage correct 78.792 #136 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 ABNet-2G-R0 Percentage correct 73.930 #160 of 211 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Introduced by this paper: ABNet, ANDHRA Module

ABNetANDHRA Module

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections