Papers › ANDHRA Bandersnatch: Training Neural Networks to Predict Parallel Realities
ANDHRA Bandersnatch: Training Neural Networks to Predict Parallel Realities
Venkata Satya Sai Ajay Daliparthi
Inspired by the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI), this work introduces a novel neural network architecture that splits the same input signal into parallel branches at each layer, utilizing a Hyper Rectified Activation, referred to as ANDHRA. The branched layers do not merge and form separate network paths, leading to multiple network heads for output prediction. For a network with a branching factor of 2 at three levels, the total number of heads is 2^3 = 8 . The individual heads are jointly trained by combining their respective loss values. However, the proposed architecture requires additional parameters and memory during training due to the additional branches. During inference, the experimental results on CIFAR-10/100 demonstrate that there exists one individual head that outperforms the baseline accuracy, achieving statistically significant improvement with equal parameters and computational cost.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | ABNet-2G-R3-Combined | Percentage correct | 96.378 | #115 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | ABNet-2G-R3 | Percentage correct | 96.088 | #121 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | ABNet-2G-R2 | Percentage correct | 95.900 | #125 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | ABNet-2G-R1 | Percentage correct | 95.536 | #131 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | ABNet-2G-R0 | Percentage correct | 94.118 | #163 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | ABNet-2G-R3-Combined | Percentage correct | 82.784 | #97 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | ABNet-2G-R3 | Percentage correct | 80.830 | #124 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | ABNet-2G-R2 | Percentage correct | 80.354 | #128 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | ABNet-2G-R1 | Percentage correct | 78.792 | #136 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | ABNet-2G-R0 | Percentage correct | 73.930 | #160 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Introduced by this paper: ABNet, ANDHRA Module
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections