Papers › RPM-Net: Robust Point Matching using Learned Features
RPM-Net: Robust Point Matching using Learned Features
Zi Jian Yew, Gim Hee Lee
Iterative Closest Point (ICP) solves the rigid point cloud registration problem iteratively in two steps: (1) make hard assignments of spatially closest point correspondences, and then (2) find the least-squares rigid transformation. The hard assignments of closest point correspondences based on spatial distances are sensitive to the initial rigid transformation and noisy/outlier points, which often cause ICP to converge to wrong local minima. In this paper, we propose the RPM-Net -- a less sensitive to initialization and more robust deep learning-based approach for rigid point cloud registration. To this end, our network uses the differentiable Sinkhorn layer and annealing to get soft assignments of point correspondences from hybrid features learned from both spatial coordinates and local geometry. To further improve registration performance, we introduce a secondary network to predict optimal annealing parameters. Unlike some existing methods, our RPM-Net handles missing correspondences and point clouds with partial visibility. Experimental results show that our RPM-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to existing non-deep learning and recent deep learning methods. Our source code is available at the project website https://github.com/yewzijian/RPMNet .
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2003.13479")
Code
Syntology Ran 6 of 31 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 25 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 4 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 17 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran; community (archive-listed): 14 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
31 samples harvested; 6 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 25 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 14 of the 31 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e6531f546e55f6af · report
552ad03917659f63 · report
8778312931854a3b · report
0188255c8db5f0c5 · report
4db73dd57b5d6162 · report
a2a91d3eb9618070 · report
d79505bf2d1d5cb9 · report
8a632dcefddc5fc1 · report
5eef8614474cef47 · report
7944c9b1c74881cb · report
89304006422410bd · report
caea4df4266011b9 · report
c3f07450b8d24c41 · report
d9502fe2fe76bf06 · report
9658f194c41b4f13 · report
01535a12b106422c · report
a020832e85dfd32f · report
5706ca4fef0f2696 · report
1adcfbd14aa61be6 · report
78cd571bf9c38cc0 · report
b83c09e9a41febed · report
1f8e2a3d2a65c39a · report
b0f6aff69d22bcdd · report
f41a4accdacef815 · report
39959096693129c5 · report
a45813b942a85200 · report
fbc79bc476871f2f · report
9e2e626d60f3368d · report
35d8b1f2dc9d527e · report
a326f2a06da4eba0 · report
5ae801ea174c3f2d · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Introduced by this paper: RPM-Net
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections