Papers › Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Again

Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Again

25 Apr 2019arXiv:1904.11486archive 2025-07-28

Richard Zhang

Modern convolutional networks are not shift-invariant, as small input shifts or translations can cause drastic changes in the output. Commonly used downsampling methods, such as max-pooling, strided-convolution, and average-pooling, ignore the sampling theorem. The well-known signal processing fix is anti-aliasing by low-pass filtering before downsampling. However, simply inserting this module into deep networks degrades performance; as a result, it is seldomly used today. We show that when integrated correctly, it is compatible with existing architectural components, such as max-pooling and strided-convolution. We observe \textit{increased accuracy} in ImageNet classification, across several commonly-used architectures, such as ResNet, DenseNet, and MobileNet, indicating effective regularization. Furthermore, we observe \textit{better generalization}, in terms of stability and robustness to input corruptions. Our results demonstrate that this classical signal processing technique has been undeservingly overlooked in modern deep networks. Code and anti-aliased versions of popular networks are available at https://richzhang.github.io/antialiased-cnns/ .

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1904.11486")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 4 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran; 2 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

adobe/antialiased-cnns officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report
mauriceweiler/MobiusCNNs mentioned on GitHubpytorchGPL-3.0 report
mnikitin/Shift-Invariant-CNNs mentioned on GitHubmxnet report
ricky40403/BlurPool mentioned on GitHub report
rwightman/pytorch-image-models mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2unverified

Licence: 3 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

resnet18 adobe/antialiased-cnns/antialiased_cnns/resnet.py official repository unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 27ab42311803bf0e · report
convert_model tattaka/Antialiased-CNNs-Converter-PyTorch/antialiased_cnns_converter/antialiased_cnns_converter.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 32c38f429da97bdd · report
conv1x1 identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · d9def42110729a85 · report
conv3x3 identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · 160bb14bd76201b4 · report

Tasks

Classification ConsistencyConditional Image GenerationDomain GeneralizationImage ClassificationImage Generation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 41.7 #26 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 46.1 #26 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 35.7 #26 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 41.5 #29 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 45.3 #29 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 35.2 #29 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 41.1 #31 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 45.2 #31 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 35.1 #31 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 41 #32 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 45.8 #32 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-101 (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 34.8 #32 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 40.3 #36 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 45.1 #36 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 33.4 #36 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 40 #37 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 44.7 #37 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-50 (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 34.3 #37 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet121 (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 38.7 #43 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet121 (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 42.7 #43 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet121 (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 32 #43 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 38.3 #44 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 42.8 #44 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 32.4 #44 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet-121 (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 38.3 #45 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet-121 (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 42.8 #45 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet-121 (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 32.3 #45 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 38.3 #46 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 42.9 #46 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 31.9 #46 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet-121 (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 38.3 #47 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet-121 (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 43.1 #47 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification DenseNet-121 (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 31.7 #47 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 37.2 #53 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 41.8 #53 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 31.3 #53 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 37.2 #54 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 42.5 #54 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-34 (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 29.9 #54 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 37 #55 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 41.7 #55 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 30.8 #55 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 36.9 #56 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 42.1 #56 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 BN (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 30.6 #56 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 36 #64 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 40.3 #64 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 30.4 #64 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 35.8 #66 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 40.1 #66 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 29.1 #66 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 35.6 #68 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 39.5 #68 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 28.5 #68 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 35.5 #69 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 39.2 #69 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification MobileNetV2 (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 30.3 #69 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 35.5 #70 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 40.1 #70 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 28.7 #70 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 35.1 #71 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 40 #71 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 28.2 #71 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 34.7 #75 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 38.9 #75 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification ResNet-18 (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 27.7 #75 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 34.5 #76 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 39.4 #76 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 27.8 #76 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 33.5 #79 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 38.5 #79 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification VGG-16 (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 26.7 #79 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf3) Accuracy - All Images 23.1 #87 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf3) Accuracy - Clean Images 26.8 #87 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf3) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 17.5 #87 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf2) Accuracy - All Images 22.8 #88 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf2) Accuracy - Clean Images 26.8 #88 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf2) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 18.2 #88 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf5) Accuracy - All Images 22.7 #89 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf5) Accuracy - Clean Images 26.8 #89 of 90 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization VizWiz-Classification AlexNet (lpf5) Accuracy - Corrupted Images 18.4 #89 of 90 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Introduced by this paper: Anti-Alias Downsampling

1x1 ConvolutionAnti-Alias DownsamplingAverage PoolingBatch NormalizationBottleneck Residual BlockConcatenated Skip ConnectionConvolutionDense BlockDense ConnectionsDropoutGlobal Average PoolingKaiming InitializationMax PoolingReLUResidual BlockResidual ConnectionSoftmax

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections