Methods › Natural Language Processing › Transformers › GPT-Neo › Papers where code ran, page 1
GPT-Neo
Papers archive 2025-07-28
archive papers tagged: 38 · with a code link: 24 · where Syntology ran a sample: 11 (9 with a run with no instrument failure, 2 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument) Syntology
Show: all tagged papersonly where code ran (11 of 38 tagged: 9 with a run with no instrument failure, 2 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument)
Syntology We ran code from the paper's repository; we did not isolate this method inside it.
Page 1 of 1: papers 1 to 11 of the 11 tagged papers where Syntology ran at least one harvested sample (9 with a run with no instrument failure, 2 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument), newest first by the archive's date (ties by arXiv id). This is a filter on Syntology's record ordered by date only, not a ranking; a run is not a correctness claim. A paper missing from this list is not a recorded non-run: it may have no arXiv id, no harvested code, or only samples that have not run yet.
Repository counts are the archive's code-links table. A Syntology line states what Syntology ran from that paper's harvested code, as “N ran (of which C constructed an object rather than computing a result; K with no instrument failure: H honoured, V violated, P with no contract checked; I where Syntology's instrument failed) · U unverified”; the instrument figure counts failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code. It is per sample and not a correctness claim. When the archive marks a repository official for the paper, the line starts with that repository's state (the archive's flag, not a verdict on who wrote the code; “community repositories only” when every sample that ran came from a community repository, “official: no sample here; runs from other or unrecorded repositories” when some came from a repository the paper names or has in its text, or from none recorded); hover it for the repositories the samples that ran came from.
-
The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of Nucleus Sampling on Mitigating Text Memorization 29 Aug 2024 · 1 repository · arXiv:2408.16345Syntology official (archive's flag): 8 ran · 8 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 8 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 1 violated, 7 with no contract checked; 0 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 3 unverified (of 11 harvested samples) · 11 pointer-only (licence)
-
Towards Robust and Parameter-Efficient Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs 13 Aug 2024 · 1 repository · arXiv:2408.06621Syntology official (archive's flag): 2 ran · 2 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 0 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 0 with no contract checked; 2 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 0 unverified (of 2 harvested samples)
-
Watermarking LLMs with Weight Quantization 17 Oct 2023 · 1 repository · arXiv:2310.11237Syntology official (archive's flag): 1 ran · 1 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 1 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 1 with no contract checked; 0 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 9 unverified (of 10 harvested samples) · 10 pointer-only (licence)
-
Test-Time Training on Nearest Neighbors for Large Language Models 29 May 2023 · 1 repository · arXiv:2305.18466Syntology official (archive's flag): 3 ran · 3 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 3 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 3 with no contract checked; 0 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 2 unverified (of 5 harvested samples)
-
TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English? 12 May 2023 · 8 repositories · arXiv:2305.07759Syntology 10 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 8 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 8 with no contract checked; 2 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 8 unverified (of 18 harvested samples)
-
Collateral facilitation in humans and language models 9 Nov 2022 · 1 repository · arXiv:2211.05198Syntology official (archive's flag): 1 ran · 1 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 0 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 0 with no contract checked; 1 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 0 unverified (of 1 harvested sample)
-
Fault-Aware Neural Code Rankers 4 Jun 2022 · 1 repository · arXiv:2206.03865Syntology official (archive's flag): 4 ran · 4 ran (of which 1 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 2 with no instrument failure: 1 honoured, 0 violated, 1 with no contract checked; 2 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 1 unverified (of 5 harvested samples)
-
GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model 14 Apr 2022 · 11 repositories · arXiv:2204.06745Syntology community repositories only · 2 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 2 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 2 with no contract checked; 0 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 1 unverified (of 3 harvested samples)
-
A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models of Code 26 Feb 2022 · 3 repositories · arXiv:2202.13169Syntology official (archive's flag): 2 ran · 2 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 1 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 1 violated, 0 with no contract checked; 1 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 1 unverified (of 3 harvested samples)
-
Controlling Conditional Language Models without Catastrophic Forgetting 1 Dec 2021 · 2 repositories · arXiv:2112.00791Syntology official (archive's flag): 3 ran · 7 ran (of which 1 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 5 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 5 with no contract checked; 2 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 1 unverified (of 8 harvested samples) · 4 pointer-only (licence)
-
Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS 20 May 2021 · 3 repositories · arXiv:2105.09938Syntology official (archive's flag): 7 ran · 7 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 7 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 7 with no contract checked; 0 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 4 unverified (of 11 harvested samples) · 2 pointer-only (licence)