Methods › General › Interpretability › Disentangled Attribution Curves

Disentangled Attribution Curves

1 paper tagged archive 2025-07-28

Introduced by Summer Devlin et al. in Disentangled Attribution Curves for Interpreting Random Forests and Boosted Trees

archive 2025-07-28 Description, source and code snippet are the archive's method entry.

Disentangled Attribution Curves (DAC) provide interpretations of tree ensemble methods in the form of (multivariate) feature importance curves. For a given variable, or group of variables, DAC plots the importance of a variable(s) as their value changes.

The Figure to the right shows an example. The tree depicts a decision tree which performs binary classification using two features (representing the XOR function). In this problem, knowing the value of one of the features without knowledge of the other feature yields no information - the classifier still has a 50% chance of predicting either class. As a result, DAC produces curves which assign 0 importance to either feature on its own. Knowing both features yields perfect information about the classifier, and thus the DAC curve for both features together correctly shows that the interaction of the features produces the model’s predictions.

PaperSourceSee Code · csinva/disentangled-attribution-curves

Papers archive 2025-07-28

1 shown of 1, newest first. Repository counts are the archive's code-links table. A Syntology line states what Syntology ran from that paper's harvested code; it is per sample and not a correctness claim.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

3 tasks the archive attaches to papers tagged with this method, by distinct papers. A task without a page in the catalog is plain text.

TaskPapers
Feature Engineering1
Feature Importance1
Interpretable Machine Learning1

Usage over time archive 2025-07-28

Papers per year tagged with Disentangled Attribution Curves: 2019 to 2019, peak 1 1 0 2019: 1 paper 2019
Papers per year the archive tags with this method, by the paper's archive date (1 dated). Bars are counts, not a trend claim.

Components: the archive holds no method-to-method composition, so PwC's Components table cannot be rebuilt; the Papers list carries no Results column for the same reason (the archive does not join its leaderboard rows to method tags).

Categories archive 2025-07-28

Interpretability

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections