Datasets › InDL
InDL (In-Diagram Logic)
Dataset Introduction
In this work, we introduce the In-Diagram Logic (InDL) dataset, an innovative resource crafted to rigorously evaluate the logic interpretation abilities of deep learning models. This dataset leverages the complex domain of visual illusions, providing a unique challenge for these models.
The InDL dataset is characterized by its intricate assembly of optical illusions, wherein each instance poses a specific logic interpretation challenge. These illusions are constructed based on six classic geometric optical illusions, known for their intriguing interplay between perception and logic.
Motivations and Content
The motivation behind the creation of the InDL dataset arises from a recognized gap in current deep learning research. While models have exhibited remarkable proficiency in various domains such as image recognition and natural language processing, their performance in tasks requiring logical reasoning remains less understood and often opaque due to their inherent 'black box' characteristics. By using the medium of visual illusions, the InDL dataset aims to probe these models in a unique and challenging way, helping to illuminate their logic interpretation capabilities.
The InDL dataset is a comprehensive collection of instances where each visual illusion varies in illusion strength. The strength signifies the degree of distortion introduced to challenge the models' logic interpretation. Hence, the dataset not only offers a complexity gradient for model evaluation but also allows the analysis of model performance against varying degrees of challenge intensity.
Potential Use Cases
The potential use cases of the InDL dataset are extensive. Beyond the primary goal of evaluating deep learning models' logic interpretation abilities, it also presents a robust tool for researchers to investigate how models react to visual perception challenges. This opens avenues to understand how these models can be improved and how their decision-making processes can be better interpreted.
Additionally, the InDL dataset could provide a rich testing ground for model developers. Its diverse and challenging instances could allow them to rigorously benchmark their models and detect potential weaknesses that might be overlooked in more conventional datasets.
Furthermore, the InDL dataset could serve as a valuable resource for teaching and learning purposes. It provides a visually engaging and intellectually stimulating way to explore the capabilities and limitations of deep learning models, particularly in the realm of logic interpretation.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
All 1 leaderboard whose dataset resolves to this page shown (sort by any header). "First row" is the archive's own first row at snapshot, in the archive's row order; nothing here re-ranks and metric direction is not asserted.
| First row (archive order) | Paper | Code | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | InDL | ConvNext Average Recall 93.47% | A ConvNet for the 2020s | keras-team/keras +53 | 9 | Compare |
Papers archive 2025-07-28
9 shown of 9 papers with a leaderboard row on this dataset's benchmarks, newest first. The archive's own "papers using this dataset" list was never published, so this is the benchmark-backed subset; the archive's count for this dataset is 10. The Syntology column is from Syntology's graph (read 2026-09-24), stated per sample; it is not part of any archive number.
| Date | Samples run Syntology | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A ConvNet for the 2020s | 54 | 1 | 10 Jan 2022 | ran 54 of 80 samples (26 unverified; 11 pointer-only for licence) |
| ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timm | 14 | 1 | 1 Oct 2021 | ran 0 of 3 samples (3 unverified) |
| Searching for MobileNetV3 | 67 | 1 | 6 May 2019 | ran 58 of 105 samples (47 unverified; 46 pointer-only for licence) |
| YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement | 311 | 1 | 8 Apr 2018 | ran 18 of 124 samples (106 unverified; 19 pointer-only for licence) |
| Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition | 17 | 1 | 21 Jul 2017 | ran 0 of 1 samples (1 unverified; 1 pointer-only for licence) |
| Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions | 41 | 1 | 7 Oct 2016 | ran 1 of 15 samples (14 unverified) |
| Densely Connected Convolutional Networks | 146 | 1 | 25 Aug 2016 | ran 18 of 71 samples (53 unverified; 7 pointer-only for licence) |
| Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning | 87 | 1 | 23 Feb 2016 | ran 1 of 1 samples (0 unverified) |
| Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition | 305 | 1 | 4 Sep 2014 | ran 12 of 122 samples (110 unverified; 4 pointer-only for licence) |
Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28
1 loader as listed in the archive; links are outbound and not re-checked here.
Tasks archive 2025-07-28
License archive 2025-07-28
Modalities archive 2025-07-28
Languages archive 2025-07-28
Variants archive 2025-07-28
- InDL
1 variant name, as the archive lists them.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections