Browse State-of-the-Art › Zero-Shot Intent Classification
Zero-Shot Intent Classification
3 papers with code · 0 benchmarks · 1 dataset archive 2025-07-28
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
No benchmark for this task in the archive.
Libraries
Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.
Datasets archive 2025-07-28
1 dataset whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.
Subtasks archive 2025-07-28
No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.
Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28
3 shown of 3 papers with code (7 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.
-
18 Apr 2022 6 repositories listed Syntology ran 1 of 10 samples · 9 unverified · 1 pointer-only (licence)We present the MASSIVE dataset--Multilingual Amazon Slu resource package (SLURP) for Slot-filling, Intent classification, and Virtual assistant Evaluation.
-
1 Jul 2020 1 repository listedUser intent classification plays a vital role in dialogue systems.
-
1 Nov 2019 1 repository listedWith the burgeoning of conversational AI, existing systems are not capable of handling numerous fast-emerging intents, which motivates zero-shot intent classification.
Syntology lines on 1 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections