Browse State-of-the-Art › Unsupervised Video Object Segmentation

Unsupervised Video Object Segmentation

52 papers with code · 6 benchmarks · 8 datasets archive 2025-07-28

Computer Vision

The unsupervised scenario assumes that the user does not interact with the algorithm to obtain the segmentation masks. Methods should provide a set of object candidates with no overlapping pixels that span through the whole video sequence. This set of objects should contain at least the objects that capture human attention when watching the whole video sequence i.e objects that are more likely to be followed by human gaze.

Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

6 leaderboard tables shown for this task, 6 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted.

DatasetBest model (first row in archive order)PaperCodeSyntologyCompare
DAVIS 2016 val (25 rows) GSANet Guided Slot Attention for Unsupervised Video Object Segmentation code — Compare
YouTube-Objects (16 rows) FakeFlow Improving Unsupervised Video Object Segmentation via Fake Flow Generation — — Compare
FBMS test (15 rows) FakeFlow Improving Unsupervised Video Object Segmentation via Fake Flow Generation — — Compare
DAVIS 2017 (val) (10 rows) DEVA (EntitySeg) Tracking Anything with Decoupled Video Segmentation code Syntology ran 7 of 10 samples · 3 unverified Compare
DAVIS 2017 (test-dev) (6 rows) DEVA (EntitySeg) Tracking Anything with Decoupled Video Segmentation code Syntology ran 7 of 10 samples · 3 unverified Compare
SegTrack v2 (4 rows) FrameSelect Mask Selection and Propagation for Unsupervised Video Object Segmentation code — Compare

Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Libraries

Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.

Datasets archive 2025-07-28

8 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.

Subtasks archive 2025-07-28

No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.

Parent tasks archive 2025-07-28

Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28

30 shown of 52 papers with code (89 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.

Syntology lines on 8 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections