Browse State-of-the-Art › JPEG Artifact Correction

JPEG Artifact Correction

12 papers with code · 39 benchmarks · 5 datasets archive 2025-07-28

Computer Vision

Correction of visual artifacts caused by JPEG compression, these artifacts are usually grouped into three types: blocking, blurring, and ringing. They are caused by quantization and removal of high frequency DCT coefficients.

Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

39 leaderboard tables shown for this task, 39 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted. 10 shown of 39 until expanded.

DatasetBest model (first row in archive order)PaperCodeSyntologyCompare
Live1 (Quality 10 Grayscale) (13 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
LIVE1 (Quality 20 Grayscale) (12 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
LIVE1 (Quality 10 Color) (9 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
LIVE1 (Quality 20 Color) (9 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Classic5 (Quality 10 Grayscale) (7 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
LIVE1 (Quality 30 Grayscale) (7 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Classic5 (Quality 20 Grayscale) (6 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Classic5 (Quality 30 Grayscale) (6 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
ICB (Quality 10 Color) (6 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
ICB (Quality 20 Color) (6 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
Classic5 (Quality 40 Grayscale) (5 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
ICB (Quality 10 Grayscale) (5 rows) QGAC Quantization Guided JPEG Artifact Correction code — Compare
ICB (Quality 20 Grayscale) (5 rows) QGAC Quantization Guided JPEG Artifact Correction code — Compare
LIVE1 (Quality 40 Grayscale) (5 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
ICB (Quality 30 Color) (4 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
LIVE1 (Quality 30 Color) (3 rows) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
BSDS500 (Quality 10 Color) (2 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
BSDS500 (Quality 20 Color) (2 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
BSDS500 (Quality 30 Color) (2 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
BSDS500 (Quality 10 Grayscale) (2 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
BSDS500 (Quality 20 Grayscale) (2 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
BSDS500 (Quality 30 Grayscale) (2 rows) FBCNN Towards Flexible Blind JPEG Artifacts Removal code Syntology ran 9 of 11 samples · 2 unverified Compare
BSD500 (Quality 10 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
BSD500 (Quality 20 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
BSD500 (Quality 30 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
BSD500 (Quality 40 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
ICB (Quality 30 Grayscale) (1 row) QGAC Quantization Guided JPEG Artifact Correction code — Compare
LIVE1 (Quality 40 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Live1 (Quality 50 Grayscale) (1 row) HyperRes Hypernetwork-Based Adaptive Image Restoration code Syntology ran 1 of 1 samples · 0 unverified Compare
Live1 (Quality 70 Grayscale) (1 row) HyperRes Hypernetwork-Based Adaptive Image Restoration code Syntology ran 1 of 1 samples · 0 unverified Compare
Live1 (Quality 80 Grayscale) (1 row) HyperRes Hypernetwork-Based Adaptive Image Restoration code Syntology ran 1 of 1 samples · 0 unverified Compare
Urban100 (Quality 10 Grayscale) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Urban100 (Quality 20 Grayscale) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Urban100 (Quality 30 Grayscale) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Urban100 (Quality 40 Grayscale) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Urban100 (Quality 10 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Urban100 (Quality 20 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Urban100 (Quality 30 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare
Urban100 (Quality 40 Color) (1 row) Hi-IR Hierarchical Information Flow for Generalized Efficient Image Restoration — — Compare

Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Libraries

Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.

Datasets archive 2025-07-28

5 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.

Subtasks archive 2025-07-28

No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.

Parent tasks archive 2025-07-28

Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28

12 shown of 12 papers with code (18 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.

Syntology lines on 5 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections