Browse State-of-the-Art › Cross-Part Crowd Counting
Cross-Part Crowd Counting
2 papers with code · 0 benchmarks · 1 dataset archive 2025-07-28
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
No benchmark for this task in the archive.
Libraries
Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.
Datasets archive 2025-07-28
1 dataset whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.
Subtasks archive 2025-07-28
No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.
Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28
2 shown of 2 papers with code (2 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.
-
9 Apr 2023 2 repositories listed Syntology ran 0 of 1 samples · 1 unverified · 1 pointer-only (licence)To the best of our knowledge, CrowdCLIP is the first to investigate the vision language knowledge to solve the counting problem.
-
12 May 2023 1 repository listed Syntology ran 4 of 4 samples · 0 unverifiedSpecifically, we propose CLIP-Count, the first end-to-end pipeline that estimates density maps for open-vocabulary objects with text guidance in a zero-shot manner.
Syntology lines on 2 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections