Browse › Miscellaneous › Social Media Popularity Prediction › SMP Test Split
SMP Test Split Benchmark (Social Media Popularity Prediction)
Social Media Popularity Prediction (SMPP) aims to predict the future popularity (e.g., clicks, views, likes, etc.) of online posts automatically via plenty of social media data from public platforms. It is a crucial problem for social media learning and forecasting and one of the most challenging problems in the field. With the ever-changing user interests and public attention on social media platforms, how to predict popularity accurately becomes more challenging than before. This task is valuable to content providers, marketers, or consumers in a range of real-world applications, including multimedia advertising, recommendation system, or trend analysis.
The archive carries no text for this table; the description above is the archive's text for the task Social Media Popularity Prediction. archive 2025-07-28
Over time archive 2025-07-28
The chart needs JavaScript; the table below carries every value.
Direction inferred from the metric name, not from the archive: MAE (lower is better). Not inferred (points only, no best-so-far line): SRC. Points are placed at the row's paper date; 0 of 27 rows carry one.
Results archive 2025-07-28
Archive rows end at the archive snapshot, 2025-07-28: no result published after that date is in this table. Rank is the archive's row order at that snapshot; not re-ranked here. Metric values are the archive's strings. Column headers sort the table in your browser; each row keeps its archive rank.
| Paper | Code | Ran Syntology | Report | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jiangeng | 0.7 | 1.4 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 2 | ecnu_aida | 0.7 | 1.38 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 3 | eva00 | 0.69 | 1.48 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 4 | DMFirstTry | 0.69 | 1.32 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 5 | USTC CrossModal Robot | 0.67 | 1.4 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 6 | UESTC IntelliGame Lab | 0.65 | 1.4 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 7 | USTC CrossModal SeniorG | 0.64 | 1.41 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 8 | acvlab_ncku | 0.64 | 1.41 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 9 | Debut | 0.64 | 1.39 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 10 | chizhu | 0.64 | 1.39 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 11 | acvlab | 0.63 | 1.42 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 12 | canI | 0.62 | 1.63 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 13 | hch | 0.62 | 1.51 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 14 | littleRed | 0.61 | 1.64 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 15 | RIGHT | 0.59 | 1.63 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 16 | NTUST_VIP | 0.58 | 1.7 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 17 | first competition | 0.57 | 1.56 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 18 | ping | 0.56 | 1.61 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 19 | wild_pointer | 0.55 | 2.05 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 20 | Shawn | 0.55 | 1.71 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 21 | aoe | 0.54 | 1.73 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 22 | _TrioNV_ | 0.52 | 1.7 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 23 | lgb_avg | 0.51 | 1.91 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 24 | fruit_yogurt | 0.51 | 1.84 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 25 | zhou | 0.49 | 1.67 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 26 | LCT | 0.48 | 2.22 | – | – | – | not matched | report | |
| 27 | lgb | 0.47 | 2.15 | – | – | – | not matched | report |
All 27 rows shown. 0 link to a paper page on this site; 0 are marked as using additional training data in the archive. No GitHub stars are tracked; "Code" is the first repository the archive lists for the row. The archive carries no row tags, review links or community-submitted rows for this table; none are shown. archive 2025-07-28
Syntology Ran reads "N of M ran · U unverified": of the M code samples Syntology harvested from repositories linked to that row's paper (joined by arXiv id), N executed on a synthesized input and the other U = M−N are unverified (harvested, no recorded run). It counts code from repositories linked to that row's paper, not this result: the row's number was not reproduced and nothing here is a correctness claim. The other cell texts mean no graph line for the row: "linked, not harvested" (the archive links code, Syntology has not harvested it), "no code linked" (no code link in the archive), "not matched" (the row's paper URL matched no paper on this site). 0 rows have a graph line, from 0 distinct papers; 0 rows (0 papers) have at least one sample that ran. Counting each paper once: Syntology ran 0 of 0 samples; 0 unverified. Separately, 0 of those 0 are pointer-only (licence): the site points at that code rather than redistributing it, a licence property recorded for ran and unverified samples alike; each cell's tooltip carries the row's own pointer-only count. Read from the graph 2026-09-24. Per-sample status is on the paper page.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections