Browse › Graphs › Graph Classification › NCI1

Graph Classification archive 2025-07-28

NCI1 Benchmark (Graph Classification)

69 rows 60 with code listed 2 metrics Dataset page

Graph Classification is a task that involves classifying a graph-structured data into different classes or categories. Graphs are a powerful way to represent relationships and interactions between different entities, and graph classification can be applied to a wide range of applications, such as social network analysis, bioinformatics, and recommendation systems. In graph classification, the input is a graph, and the goal is to learn a classifier that can accurately predict the class of the graph.

The archive carries no text for this table; the description above is the archive's text for the task Graph Classification. archive 2025-07-28

Over time archive 2025-07-28

The chart needs JavaScript; the table below carries every value.

Direction inferred from the metric name, not from the archive: Accuracy (higher is better), Accuracy (10-fold) (higher is better). Points are placed at the row's paper date; 69 of 69 rows carry one.

Results archive 2025-07-28

Archive rows end at the archive snapshot, 2025-07-28: no result published after that date is in this table. Rank is the archive's row order at that snapshot; not re-ranked here. Metric values are the archive's strings. Column headers sort the table in your browser; each row keeps its archive rank.

Paper Code Ran Syntology Report
1 TFGW ADJ (L=2) 88.1% – Paper Code 2022 linked, not harvested report
2 ESA (Edge set attention, no positional encodings) 87.835±0.644 – Paper Code 2024 linked, not harvested report
3 WKPI-kmeans 87.2% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
4 FGW wl h=4 sp 86.42% – Paper Code 2018 3 of 3 ran · 0 unverified report
5 WL-OA Kernel 86.1% – Paper Code 2018 linked, not harvested report
6 WL-OA 86.1% – Paper – 2016 no code linked report
7 FGW wl h=2 sp 85.82% – Paper Code 2018 3 of 3 ran · 0 unverified report
8 WWL 85.75% – Paper Code 2019 1 of 11 ran · 10 unverified report
9 δ-2-LWL 85.5% – Paper Code 2019 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified report
10 DUGNN 85.50% ✓ Paper Code 2017 linked, not harvested report
11 CIN++ 85.3% – Paper Code 2023 linked, not harvested report
12 CORE-WL 85.12% – Paper – 2019 no code linked report
13 GraphGPS 85.110±1.423 – Paper Code 2022 3 of 21 ran · 18 unverified report
14 GAT 85.109±1.107 – Paper Code 2017 51 of 106 ran · 55 unverified report
15 PIN 85.1% – Paper – 2023 no code linked report
16 PNA 84.964±1.391 – Paper Code 2020 33 of 55 ran · 22 unverified report
17 Norm-GN 84.87% – Paper Code 2021 0 of 2 ran · 2 unverified report
18 GIN 84.818±0.936 – Paper Code 2018 3 of 10 ran · 7 unverified report
19 Propagation kernels (pk) 84.5% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
20 CAN 84.5% – Paper Code 2022 2 of 5 ran · 3 unverified report
21 DropGIN 84.331±1.564 – Paper Code 2021 2 of 3 ran · 1 unverified report
22 GCN 84.185±0.644 – Paper Code 2016 32 of 58 ran · 26 unverified report
23 GIC 84.08% – Paper – 2018 no code linked report
24 sGIN 83.85% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
25 ECC (5 scores) 83.8% – Paper Code 2017 0 of 2 ran · 2 unverified report
26 GFN 83.65% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
27 Multigraph ChebNet 83.4% – Paper Code 2018 linked, not harvested report
28 PPGN 83.19% – Paper Code 2019 2 of 8 ran · 6 unverified report
29 GCAPS-CNN 82.72% – Paper Code 2018 linked, not harvested report
30 GIN-0 82.7% – Paper Code 2018 3 of 10 ran · 7 unverified report
31 GATv2 82.384±1.700 – Paper Code 2021 11 of 16 ran · 5 unverified report
32 GAT-GC (f-Scaled) 82.28% – Paper Code 2019 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified report
33 DAGCN 81.68% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
34 NERO 81.63% – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
35 GFN-light 81.43% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
36 VRGC 80.7% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
37 GIUNet 80.2% – Paper Code 2023 linked, not harvested report
38 GIN 80% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
39 S-CGIB 79.75±0.82 – Paper Code 2025 2 of 4 ran · 2 unverified report
40 HGP-SL 78.45% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
41 CapsGNN 78.35% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
42 UGT 77.55 ±0.16% – Paper Code 2023 10 of 26 ran · 16 unverified report
43 Local Topological Profile (LTP) 77.1 ± 3.777.1 ± 3.7 – Paper Code 2023 linked, not harvested report
44 Graphormer 77.032±1.393 – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
45 WEGL 76.8% – Paper Code 2020 linked, not harvested report
46 TokenGT 76.740±2.054 – Paper Code 2022 7 of 7 ran · 0 unverified report
47 DGCNN 76.4% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
48 PSCN 76.34% – Paper Code 2016 linked, not harvested report
49 k-GNN 76.2% – Paper Code 2018 linked, not harvested report
50 TREE-G 75.9% – Paper Code 2022 9 of 10 ran · 1 unverified report
51 SF + RFC 75.2% – Paper Code 2018 linked, not harvested report
52 Fea2Fea-s3 74.9% – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
53 SAEPool_g 74.48% – Paper – 2022 no code linked report
54 SAGPool_g 74.06% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
55 NDP 73.5% – Paper Code 2019 1 of 1 ran · 0 unverified report
56 2-WL-GNN 73.5 – Paper Code 2020 linked, not harvested report
57 graph2vec 73.22% ± 1.81% – Paper Code 2017 2 of 2 ran · 0 unverified report
58 LDP 73.0% – Paper Code 2018 linked, not harvested report
59 FGW raw sp 72.82% – Paper Code 2018 3 of 3 ran · 0 unverified report
60 MAGPool 72.32% – Paper Code 2024 linked, not harvested report
61 ASAP 71.48 – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
62 Deep WL SGN(0,1,2) 70.26% – Paper – 2019 no code linked report
63 DGCNN (sum) 69.00% – Paper Code 2018 linked, not harvested report
64 DDGK 68.1% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
65 GAM 67.71% – Paper Code 2018 linked, not harvested report
66 SAGPool_h 67.45% – Paper Code 2019 linked, not harvested report
67 1-NMFPool 66.2% – Paper – 2019 no code linked report
68 BC + Capsules 65.9% – Paper – 2019 no code linked report
69 SPI-GCN 64.11% – Paper – 2019 no code linked report

All 69 rows shown. 69 link to a paper page on this site; 1 are marked as using additional training data in the archive. No GitHub stars are tracked; "Code" is the first repository the archive lists for the row. The archive carries no row tags, review links or community-submitted rows for this table; none are shown. archive 2025-07-28

Syntology Ran reads "N of M ran · U unverified": of the M code samples Syntology harvested from repositories linked to that row's paper (joined by arXiv id), N executed on a synthesized input and the other U = M−N are unverified (harvested, no recorded run). It counts code from repositories linked to that row's paper, not this result: the row's number was not reproduced and nothing here is a correctness claim. The other cell texts mean no graph line for the row: "linked, not harvested" (the archive links code, Syntology has not harvested it), "no code linked" (no code link in the archive), "not matched" (the row's paper URL matched no paper on this site). 24 rows have a graph line, from 21 distinct papers; 20 rows (17 papers) have at least one sample that ran. Counting each paper once: Syntology ran 174 of 352 samples; 178 unverified. Separately, 133 of those 352 are pointer-only (licence): the site points at that code rather than redistributing it, a licence property recorded for ran and unverified samples alike; each cell's tooltip carries the row's own pointer-only count. Read from the graph 2026-09-25. Per-sample status is on the paper page.

Since the archive: results placed by Syntology Syntology

Results that newer papers report for their own method, placed here by Syntology. A model pointed at the cell in the paper's own table; the number was read from that cell and checked against this leaderboard's metric, dataset, split and scale; an independent check that saw this leaderboard's other rows and every other leaderboard on the same dataset accepted it. Not reviewed by the paper's authors or by the archive's editors, and not ranked against the rows above. Measured before publishing: the extractor was run on 883 held-out archive papers and processed 881 of them (the other 2 failed with an error before producing any output and are not part of this measurement); on those 881 papers, a blind reviewer judged 108 of 110 accepted entries correct (95% lower confidence bound 0.9361). Syntology has checked 6,885 of the 9,623 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.

Paper Method (configuration) Accuracy Date Where in the paper Code Syntology Report
X-LogSMask: Expand Transformer for Graph-Structured Data arXiv:2607.01553 Trans. with X-LogSMask (ours) 82.24 2 Jul 2026 Table 6, row “Trans. with X-LogSMask (ours)” 1 of 1 ran report
Contraction and Hourglass Persistence for Learning on Graphs, Simplices, and Cells arXiv:2604.17548 NCI1 · GIN · Ours 81.51 19 Apr 2026 Table 2, row “NCI1” 2 of 4 ran report

Syntology 2 entries, one per paper, newest first by month (the arXiv date, else the month in the arXiv id), then by arXiv id. Each value is the cell text as the paper prints it; hover "Where in the paper" for the table's caption and each value's column header. Not part of the archive and not in the chart above. Drawn from 6,885 of 9,623 newer papers checked so far.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections