Papers › Your Semantic-Independent Watermark is Fragile: A Semantic Perturbation Attack against...

Your Semantic-Independent Watermark is Fragile: A Semantic Perturbation Attack against EaaS Watermark

14 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.09359archive 2025-07-28

Zekun Fei, Biao Yi, Jianing Geng, Ruiqi He, Lihai Nie, Zheli Liu

Embedding-as-a-Service (EaaS) has emerged as a successful business pattern but faces significant challenges related to various forms of copyright infringement, particularly, the API misuse and model extraction attacks. Various studies have proposed backdoor-based watermarking schemes to protect the copyright of EaaS services. In this paper, we reveal that previous watermarking schemes possess semantic-independent characteristics and propose the Semantic Perturbation Attack (SPA). Our theoretical and experimental analysis demonstrate that this semantic-independent nature makes current watermarking schemes vulnerable to adaptive attacks that exploit semantic perturbations tests to bypass watermark verification. Extensive experimental results across multiple datasets demonstrate that the True Positive Rate (TPR) for identifying watermarked samples under SPA can reach up to more than 95%, rendering watermarks ineffective while maintaining the high utility of embeddings. Furthermore, we discuss potential defense strategies to mitigate SPA. Our code is available at https://github.com/Zk4-ps/EaaS-Embedding-Watermark.

PaperPDFCode

Code

zk4-ps/eaas-embedding-watermark officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Model extraction

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AWARE

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections