Papers › X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognition
X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognition
Christoph Feichtenhofer
This paper presents X3D, a family of efficient video networks that progressively expand a tiny 2D image classification architecture along multiple network axes, in space, time, width and depth. Inspired by feature selection methods in machine learning, a simple stepwise network expansion approach is employed that expands a single axis in each step, such that good accuracy to complexity trade-off is achieved. To expand X3D to a specific target complexity, we perform progressive forward expansion followed by backward contraction. X3D achieves state-of-the-art performance while requiring 4.8x and 5.5x fewer multiply-adds and parameters for similar accuracy as previous work. Our most surprising finding is that networks with high spatiotemporal resolution can perform well, while being extremely light in terms of network width and parameters. We report competitive accuracy at unprecedented efficiency on video classification and detection benchmarks. Code will be available at: https://github.com/facebookresearch/SlowFast
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2004.04730")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 15 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 13 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 15 samples from 3 repositories, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
15 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 13 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0a3fae1570b6c8c7 · report
acfa08610335818d · report
293dab24489b41d1 · report
8ce6bc3f1fabc927 · report
e5f77ac329bf7def · report
624693b57e7dcd4a · report
d6a99ec714147ac1 · report
0aca91fe0fed88cb · report
64bc6885f46ca205 · report
4ed34e164b9d3a9f · report
b033c87e17ebe6b9 · report
f040ea8252820867 · report
1a80346f67ccb9cf · report
e90ba252e203e0e9 · report
7be94293e72825f2 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Action Classification | Kinetics-400 | X3D-XXL | Acc@1 | 80.4 | #100 of 207 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Classification | Kinetics-400 | X3D-XXL | Acc@5 | 94.6 | #100 of 207 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Classification | Kinetics-400 | X3D-XL | Acc@1 | 79.1 | #118 of 207 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Classification | Kinetics-400 | X3D-XL | Acc@5 | 93.9 | #118 of 207 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Classification | Kinetics-400 | X3D-L | Acc@1 | 77.5 | #137 of 207 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Classification | Kinetics-400 | X3D-L | Acc@5 | 92.9 | #137 of 207 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Classification | Kinetics-400 | X3D-M | Acc@1 | 76 | #150 of 207 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Action Classification | Kinetics-400 | X3D-M | Acc@5 | 92.3 | #150 of 207 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections