Papers › X-ray Made Simple: Lay Radiology Report Generation and Robust Evaluation

X-ray Made Simple: Lay Radiology Report Generation and Robust Evaluation

25 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.17911archive 2025-07-28

Kun Zhao, Chenghao Xiao, Sixing Yan, Haoteng Tang, William K. Cheung, Noura Al Moubayed, Liang Zhan, Chenghua Lin

Radiology Report Generation (RRG) has advanced considerably with the development of multimodal generative models. Despite the progress, the field still faces significant challenges in evaluation, as existing metrics lack robustness and fairness. We reveal that, RRG with high performance on existing lexical-based metrics (e.g. BLEU) might be more of a mirage - a model can get a high BLEU only by learning the template of reports. This has become a pressing issue for RRG due to the highly patternized nature of these reports. In addition, standard radiology reports are often highly technical. Helping patients understand these reports is crucial from a patient's perspective, yet this has been largely overlooked in previous work. In this work, we un-intuitively approach these problems by proposing the Layman's RRG framework that can systematically improve RRG with day-to-day language. Specifically, our framework first contributes a translated Layman's terms dataset. Building upon the dataset, we then propose a semantics-based evaluation method, which is effective in mitigating the inflated numbers of BLEU and provides more robust evaluation. We show that training on the layman's terms dataset encourages models to focus on the semantics of the reports, as opposed to overfitting to learning the report templates. Last, we reveal a promising scaling law between the number of training examples and semantics gain provided by our dataset, compared to the inverse pattern brought by the original formats.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

hegehongcha/laymanrrg officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Fairness

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Focus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections