Papers › Why does my medical AI look at pictures of birds? Exploring the efficacy of transfer...

Why does my medical AI look at pictures of birds? Exploring the efficacy of transfer learning across domain boundaries

30 Jun 2023arXiv:2306.17555archive 2025-07-28

Frederic Jonske, Moon Kim, Enrico Nasca, Janis Evers, Johannes Haubold, René Hosch, Felix Nensa, Michael Kamp, Constantin Seibold, Jan Egger, Jens Kleesiek

It is an open secret that ImageNet is treated as the panacea of pretraining. Particularly in medical machine learning, models not trained from scratch are often finetuned based on ImageNet-pretrained models. We posit that pretraining on data from the domain of the downstream task should almost always be preferred instead. We leverage RadNet-12M, a dataset containing more than 12 million computed tomography (CT) image slices, to explore the efficacy of self-supervised pretraining on medical and natural images. Our experiments cover intra- and cross-domain transfer scenarios, varying data scales, finetuning vs. linear evaluation, and feature space analysis. We observe that intra-domain transfer compares favorably to cross-domain transfer, achieving comparable or improved performance (0.44% - 2.07% performance increase using RadNet pretraining, depending on the experiment) and demonstrate the existence of a domain boundary-related generalization gap and domain-specific learned features.

PaperPDFCode

Code

tio-ikim/transfer-learning-across-domain-boundaries officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Computed Tomography (CT)Linear evaluationTransfer Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections