Papers › Why Batch Normalization Damage Federated Learning on Non-IID Data?

Why Batch Normalization Damage Federated Learning on Non-IID Data?

8 Jan 2023arXiv:2301.02982archive 2025-07-28

Yanmeng Wang, Qingjiang Shi, Tsung-Hui Chang

As a promising distributed learning paradigm, federated learning (FL) involves training deep neural network (DNN) models at the network edge while protecting the privacy of the edge clients. To train a large-scale DNN model, batch normalization (BN) has been regarded as a simple and effective means to accelerate the training and improve the generalization capability. However, recent findings indicate that BN can significantly impair the performance of FL in the presence of non-i.i.d. data. While several FL algorithms have been proposed to address this issue, their performance still falls significantly when compared to the centralized scheme. Furthermore, none of them have provided a theoretical explanation of how the BN damages the FL convergence. In this paper, we present the first convergence analysis to show that under the non-i.i.d. data, the mismatch between the local and global statistical parameters in BN causes the gradient deviation between the local and global models, which, as a result, slows down and biases the FL convergence. In view of this, we develop a new FL algorithm that is tailored to BN, called FedTAN, which is capable of achieving robust FL performance under a variety of data distributions via iterative layer-wise parameter aggregation. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed FedTAN over existing baselines for training BN-based DNN models.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from wangyanmeng/fedtan. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

1 archive method tag without a method page not shown.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections