Papers › A Gaze Data-based Comparative Study to Build a Trustworthy Human-AI Collaboration in...
A Gaze Data-based Comparative Study to Build a Trustworthy Human-AI Collaboration in Crash Anticipation
Yu Li, Muhammad Monjurul Karim, Ruwen Qin
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Vehicles with a safety function for anticipating crashes in advance can enhance drivers' ability to avoid crashes. As dashboard cameras have become a low-cost sensor device accessible to almost every vehicle, deep neural networks for crash anticipation from a dashboard camera are receiving growing interest. However, drivers' trust in the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled safety function is built on the validation of its safety enhancement toward zero deaths. This paper is motivated to establish a method that uses gaze data and corresponding measures to evaluate human drivers' ability to anticipate crashes. A laboratory experiment is designed and performed, wherein a screen-based eye tracker collects the gaze data of six volunteers while watching 100 driving videos that include both normal and crash scenarios. Statistical analyses of the experimental data show that, on average, drivers can anticipate a crash up to 2.61 seconds before it occurs in this pilot study. The chance that drivers have successfully anticipated crashes before they occur is 92.8%. A state-of-the-art AI model can anticipate crashes 1.02 seconds earlier than drivers on average. The study finds that crash-involving traffic agents in the driving videos can vary drivers' instant attention level, average attention level, and spatial attention distribution. This finding supports the development of a spatial-temporal attention mechanism for AI models to strengthen their ability to anticipate crashes. Results from the comparison also suggest the development of collaborative intelligence that keeps human-in-the-loop of AI models to further enhance the reliability of AI-enabled safety functions.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections