Papers › White-box Membership Inference Attacks against Diffusion Models

White-box Membership Inference Attacks against Diffusion Models

11 Aug 2023arXiv:2308.06405links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Yan Pang, Tianhao Wang, Xuhui Kang, Mengdi Huai, Yang Zhang

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Diffusion models have begun to overshadow GANs and other generative models in industrial applications due to their superior image generation performance. The complex architecture of these models furnishes an extensive array of attack features. In light of this, we aim to design membership inference attacks (MIAs) catered to diffusion models. We first conduct an exhaustive analysis of existing MIAs on diffusion models, taking into account factors such as black-box/white-box models and the selection of attack features. We found that white-box attacks are highly applicable in real-world scenarios, and the most effective attacks presently are white-box. Departing from earlier research, which employs model loss as the attack feature for white-box MIAs, we employ model gradients in our attack, leveraging the fact that these gradients provide a more profound understanding of model responses to various samples. We subject these models to rigorous testing across a range of parameters, including training steps, sampling frequency, diffusion steps, and data variance. Across all experimental settings, our method consistently demonstrated near-flawless attack performance, with attack success rate approaching 100% and attack AUCROC near 1.0. We also evaluate our attack against common defense mechanisms, and observe our attacks continue to exhibit commendable performance.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from py85252876/GSA. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections