Papers › What is the best data augmentation for 3D brain tumor segmentation?

What is the best data augmentation for 3D brain tumor segmentation?

26 Oct 2020arXiv:2010.13372archive 2025-07-28

Marco Domenico Cirillo, David Abramian, Anders Eklund

Training segmentation networks requires large annotated datasets, which in medical imaging can be hard to obtain. Despite this fact, data augmentation has in our opinion not been fully explored for brain tumor segmentation. In this project we apply different types of data augmentation (flipping, rotation, scaling, brightness adjustment, elastic deformation) when training a standard 3D U-Net, and demonstrate that augmentation significantly improves the network's performance in many cases. Our conclusion is that brightness augmentation and elastic deformation work best, and that combinations of different augmentation techniques do not provide further improvement compared to only using one augmentation technique. Our code is available at https://github.com/mdciri/3D-augmentation-techniques.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mdciri/3D-augmentation-techniques officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report
mdciri/augmentation officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Brain Tumor SegmentationData AugmentationSegmentationTumor Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Concatenated Skip ConnectionConvolutionMax PoolingReLUU-Net

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections