Papers › What does a cosmological experiment really measure? Covariant posterior decomposition...

What does a cosmological experiment really measure? Covariant posterior decomposition with normalizing flows

10 Dec 2021arXiv:2112.05737links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Tara Dacunha, Marco Raveri, Minsu Park, Cyrille Doux, Bhuvnesh Jain

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We present methods to rigorously extract parameter combinations that are constrained by data from posterior distributions. The standard approach uses linear methods that apply to Gaussian distributions. We show the limitations of the linear methods for current surveys, and develop non-linear methods that can be used with non-Gaussian distributions, and are independent of the parameter basis. These are made possible by the use of machine-learning models, normalizing flows, to learn posterior distributions from their samples. These models allow us to obtain the local covariance of the posterior at all positions in parameter space and use its inverse, the Fisher matrix, as a local metric over parameter space. The posterior distribution can then be non-linearly decomposed into the leading constrained parameter combinations via parallel transport in the metric space. We test our methods on two non-Gaussian, benchmark examples, and then apply them to the parameter posteriors of the Dark Energy Survey and Planck CMB lensing. We illustrate how our method automatically learns the survey-specific, best constrained effective amplitude parameter S₈ for cosmic shear alone, cosmic shear and galaxy clustering, and CMB lensing. We also identify constrained parameter combinations in the full parameter space, and as an application we estimate the Hubble constant, H₀, from large-structure data alone.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mraveri/tensiometer mentioned on GitHubtf report
mraveri/tension_tools mentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections