Papers › What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language models

What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language models

31 Jul 2019TACL 2020 1arXiv:1907.13528archive 2025-07-28

Allyson Ettinger

Pre-training by language modeling has become a popular and successful approach to NLP tasks, but we have yet to understand exactly what linguistic capacities these pre-training processes confer upon models. In this paper we introduce a suite of diagnostics drawn from human language experiments, which allow us to ask targeted questions about the information used by language models for generating predictions in context. As a case study, we apply these diagnostics to the popular BERT model, finding that it can generally distinguish good from bad completions involving shared category or role reversal, albeit with less sensitivity than humans, and it robustly retrieves noun hypernyms, but it struggles with challenging inferences and role-based event prediction -- and in particular, it shows clear insensitivity to the contextual impacts of negation.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1907.13528")

Code

Syntology Ran 5 of 10 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 9 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

aetting/lm-diagnostics officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5ran · our draft was wrong
5unverified

Licence: 1 of the 10 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

convert_to_experiment_grouping aetting/lm-diagnostics/sensitivity_tests.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · c7ea9c0d23888444 · report
process_fischler aetting/lm-diagnostics/run_diagnostics_bert.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · fbc8f579aac35580 · report
process_fk aetting/lm-diagnostics/run_diagnostics_bert.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · ea717e639e6df8cf · report
process_rr aetting/lm-diagnostics/run_diagnostics_bert.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 91c10b6209d86836 · report
cprag_sensitivity_test aetting/lm-diagnostics/sensitivity_tests.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · d9cd894ddd324224 · report
role_sensitivity_test aetting/lm-diagnostics/sensitivity_tests.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · ac1c3b07a675902f · report
test_cprag_acc aetting/lm-diagnostics/prediction_accuracy_tests.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · bc23445d491b4ec9 · report
test_neg_acc aetting/lm-diagnostics/prediction_accuracy_tests.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 2af208405982a958 · report
test_role_acc aetting/lm-diagnostics/prediction_accuracy_tests.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · d1163a4e501f8984 · report
process_data text-machine-lab/extending_psycholinguistic_dataset/src/evaluation.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 1049fad948492b30 · report

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingNegation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AdamAttentionAttention DropoutBERTDense ConnectionsDropoutLayer NormalizationLinear LayerLinear Warmup With Linear DecayMulti-Head AttentionResidual ConnectionSoftmaxWeight DecayWordPiece

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections