Papers › Weakly Supervised Learning of Cortical Surface Reconstruction from Segmentations

Weakly Supervised Learning of Cortical Surface Reconstruction from Segmentations

18 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.12650archive 2025-07-28

Qiang Ma, Liu Li, Emma C. Robinson, Bernhard Kainz, Daniel Rueckert

Existing learning-based cortical surface reconstruction approaches heavily rely on the supervision of pseudo ground truth (pGT) cortical surfaces for training. Such pGT surfaces are generated by traditional neuroimage processing pipelines, which are time consuming and difficult to generalize well to low-resolution brain MRI, e.g., from fetuses and neonates. In this work, we present CoSeg, a learning-based cortical surface reconstruction framework weakly supervised by brain segmentations without the need for pGT surfaces. CoSeg introduces temporal attention networks to learn time-varying velocity fields from brain MRI for diffeomorphic surface deformations, which fit an initial surface to target cortical surfaces within only 0.11 seconds for each brain hemisphere. A weakly supervised loss is designed to reconstruct pial surfaces by inflating the white surface along the normal direction towards the boundary of the cortical gray matter segmentation. This alleviates partial volume effects and encourages the pial surface to deform into deep and challenging cortical sulci. We evaluate CoSeg on 1,113 adult brain MRI at 1mm and 2mm resolution. CoSeg achieves superior geometric and morphological accuracy compared to existing learning-based approaches. We also verify that CoSeg can extract high-quality cortical surfaces from fetal brain MRI on which traditional pipelines fail to produce acceptable results.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from m-qiang/CoSeg. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections