Papers › Waterproof: Educational Software for Learning How to Write Mathematical Proofs

Waterproof: Educational Software for Learning How to Write Mathematical Proofs

24 Nov 2022arXiv:2211.13513links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Jelle Wemmenhove, Dick Arends, Thijs Beurskens, Maitreyee Bhaid, Sean McCarren, Jan Moraal, Diego Rivera Garrido, David Tuin, Malcolm Vassallo, Pieter Wils, Jim Portegies

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

In order to help students learn how to write mathematical proofs, we adapt the Coq proof assistant into an educational tool we call Waterproof. Like with other interactive theorem provers, students write out their proofs inside the software using a specific syntax, and the software provides feedback on the logical validity of each step. Waterproof consists of two components: a custom proof language that allows formal, machine-verified proofs to be written in a style that closely resembles handwritten proofs, and a custom editor that allows these proofs to be combined with formatted text to improve readability. The editor can be used for Coq documents in general, but also offers special features designed for use in education. Student input, for example, can be limited to specific parts of the document to prevent exercises from being accidentally deleted. Waterproof has been used to supplement teaching the Analysis 1 course at Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) for the last four years. Students started using the specific formulations of proof steps from the custom proof language in their handwritten proofs; the explicit phrasing of these sentences helped to clarify the logical structure of their arguments.

PaperPDFCode

Code

impermeable/waterproof officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections