Papers › CrowdSpeech and VoxDIY: Benchmark Datasets for Crowdsourced Audio Transcription
CrowdSpeech and VoxDIY: Benchmark Datasets for Crowdsourced Audio Transcription
Nikita Pavlichenko, Ivan Stelmakh, Dmitry Ustalov
Domain-specific data is the crux of the successful transfer of machine learning systems from benchmarks to real life. In simple problems such as image classification, crowdsourcing has become one of the standard tools for cheap and time-efficient data collection: thanks in large part to advances in research on aggregation methods. However, the applicability of crowdsourcing to more complex tasks (e.g., speech recognition) remains limited due to the lack of principled aggregation methods for these modalities. The main obstacle towards designing aggregation methods for more advanced applications is the absence of training data, and in this work, we focus on bridging this gap in speech recognition. For this, we collect and release CrowdSpeech -- the first publicly available large-scale dataset of crowdsourced audio transcriptions. Evaluation of existing and novel aggregation methods on our data shows room for improvement, suggesting that our work may entail the design of better algorithms. At a higher level, we also contribute to the more general challenge of developing the methodology for reliable data collection via crowdsourcing. In that, we design a principled pipeline for constructing datasets of crowdsourced audio transcriptions in any novel domain. We show its applicability on an under-resourced language by constructing VoxDIY -- a counterpart of CrowdSpeech for the Russian language. We also release the code that allows a full replication of our data collection pipeline and share various insights on best practices of data collection via crowdsourcing.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crowdsourced Text Aggregation | CrowdSpeech test-clean | ROVER | Word Error Rate (WER) | 7.29 | #1 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowdsourced Text Aggregation | CrowdSpeech test-clean | HRRASA | Word Error Rate (WER) | 8.59 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowdsourced Text Aggregation | CrowdSpeech test-clean | RASA | Word Error Rate (WER) | 8.6 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowdsourced Text Aggregation | CrowdSpeech test-other | ROVER | Word Error Rate (WER) | 13.41 | #1 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowdsourced Text Aggregation | CrowdSpeech test-other | HRRASA | Word Error Rate (WER) | 15.66 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowdsourced Text Aggregation | CrowdSpeech test-other | RASA | Word Error Rate (WER) | 15.67 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections