Papers › VoicePAT: An Efficient Open-source Evaluation Toolkit for Voice Privacy Research

VoicePAT: An Efficient Open-source Evaluation Toolkit for Voice Privacy Research

14 Sep 2023arXiv:2309.08049links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Sarina Meyer, Xiaoxiao Miao, Ngoc Thang Vu

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Speaker anonymization is the task of modifying a speech recording such that the original speaker cannot be identified anymore. Since the first Voice Privacy Challenge in 2020, along with the release of a framework, the popularity of this research topic is continually increasing. However, the comparison and combination of different anonymization approaches remains challenging due to the complexity of evaluation and the absence of user-friendly research frameworks. We therefore propose an efficient speaker anonymization and evaluation framework based on a modular and easily extendable structure, almost fully in Python. The framework facilitates the orchestration of several anonymization approaches in parallel and allows for interfacing between different techniques. Furthermore, we propose modifications to common evaluation methods which improves the quality of the evaluation and reduces their computation time by 65 to 95%, depending on the metric. Our code is fully open source.

PaperPDFCode

Code

digitalphonetics/voicepat officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections