Papers › ViTAEv2: Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring Inductive Bias for Image Recognition...
ViTAEv2: Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring Inductive Bias for Image Recognition and Beyond
Qiming Zhang, Yufei Xu, Jing Zhang, DaCheng Tao
Vision transformers have shown great potential in various computer vision tasks owing to their strong capability to model long-range dependency using the self-attention mechanism. Nevertheless, they treat an image as a 1D sequence of visual tokens, lacking an intrinsic inductive bias (IB) in modeling local visual structures and dealing with scale variance, which is instead learned implicitly from large-scale training data with longer training schedules. In this paper, we propose a Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring intrinsic IB from convolutions, i.e., ViTAE. Technically, ViTAE has several spatial pyramid reduction modules to downsample and embed the input image into tokens with rich multi-scale context using multiple convolutions with different dilation rates. In this way, it acquires an intrinsic scale invariance IB and can learn robust feature representation for objects at various scales. Moreover, in each transformer layer, ViTAE has a convolution block parallel to the multi-head self-attention module, whose features are fused and fed into the feed-forward network. Consequently, it has the intrinsic locality IB and is able to learn local features and global dependencies collaboratively. The proposed two kinds of cells are stacked in both isotropic and multi-stage manners to formulate two families of ViTAE models, i.e., the vanilla ViTAE and ViTAEv2. Experiments on the ImageNet dataset as well as downstream tasks on the MS COCO, ADE20K, and AP10K datasets validate the superiority of our models over the baseline transformer models and concurrent works. Besides, we scale up our ViTAE model to 644M parameters and obtain the state-of-the-art classification performance, i.e., 88.5% Top-1 classification accuracy on ImageNet validation set and the best 91.2% Top-1 accuracy on ImageNet real validation set, without using extra private data.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2202.10108")
Code
Syntology Ran 15 of 25 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 10 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 9 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 23 samples from 2 repositories, 13 ran; community: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
25 samples harvested; 15 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 10 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 2 of the 25 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
144d10b49baeb8a6 · report
3fefa875010c6edf · report
a74921de2215fc04 · report
48cf1b51f86c6f57 · report
5a8382845c81cc22 · report
dedd2d6dd673cc46 · report
e8f2f05db5500fa5 · report
b07535c6bcc4574f · report
20466726ccd0930d · report
08e6e488af05edb9 · report
6ef392f365cc5703 · report
794a2ed91a5175bd · report
61bf152e6a42a184 · report
6ff0493f05a12074 · report
b1693bc0a5bf9e5b · report
6db1322f923dc42b · report
1b9001750c072436 · report
5030170039952082 · report
5fd6b26c18104c25 · report
2c3dfd32c766d157 · report
2009bbd28575495d · report
d0814d9bf3797cb1 · report
1203a926bfe91b55 · report
61c027be5178a479 · report
5e2dbd713ec13547 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ViTAE-H + MAE (448) | Number of params | 644M | #45 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ViTAE-H + MAE (448) | Top 1 Accuracy | 88.5% | #45 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet ReaL | ViTAE-H (MAE, 512) | Accuracy | 91.2% | #2 of 57 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet ReaL | ViTAE-H (MAE, 512) | Params | 644M | #2 of 57 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections