Papers › Bridging the Gap: Examining Vision Foundation Models for Optical and Radio Astronomy...

Bridging the Gap: Examining Vision Foundation Models for Optical and Radio Astronomy Applications

17 Sep 2024arXiv:2409.11175links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

E. Lastufka, O. Bait, M. Drozdova, V. Kinakh, D. Piras, M. Audard, M. Dessauges-Zavadsky, T. Holotyak, D. Schaerer, S. Voloshynovskiy

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Vision foundation models, which have demonstrated significant potential in many multimedia applications, are often underutilized in the natural sciences. This is primarily due to mismatches between the nature of domain-specific scientific data and the typical training data used for foundation models, leading to distribution shifts. Scientific data often differ substantially in structure and characteristics, and researchers frequently face the challenge of optimizing model performance with limited labeled data of only a few hundred or thousand images. This work evaluates the performance of vision foundation models in astrophysics, with a focus on identifying the best practices for adapting them to domain-specific datasets. We aim to establish a framework for selecting, fine-tuning, and optimizing these models for common tasks in optical and radio astronomy. We compared multiple foundation models, including self-supervised, weakly supervised, and distillation-based architectures, across two representative optical and radio datasets. Experiments involved different fine-tuning strategies, projector heads, and data preprocessing techniques, with performance evaluated on classification and detection metrics. Features extracted by specific foundation models improved classification accuracy for optical galaxy images compared to conventional supervised training. Similarly, these models achieved equivalent or superior performance in object detection tasks with radio images. However, classification performance for radio galaxy images was generally poor, often falling short of supervised approaches. These findings demonstrate that vision foundation models can be effectively adapted to astrophysical applications, provided practitioners iterate on model selection, training strategies, and data handling.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2409.11175")

Code

Syntology Ran 13 of 16 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 13 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 16 samples from 1 repository, 13 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

elastufka/fm4astro officialmentioned in paperpytorchGPL-3.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

16 samples harvested; 13 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

13ran
3unverified

Licence: 16 of the 16 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from elastufka/fm4astro. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

collate_fn elastufka/fm4astro/finetune.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 1344900d0c914026 · report
default_config elastufka/fm4astro/evaluator.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · f92f16a13cfc2e6a · report
eval_binary elastufka/fm4astro/classifier_model.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 3a7b80e5682f8cd3 · report
fit_pca elastufka/fm4astro/evaluator.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · ba8c7028bbbe7a67 · report
freeze_resnet_layers elastufka/fm4astro/train_frcnn.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · af9597222f43fdd4 · report
get_all_configs elastufka/fm4astro/downstream.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 662e84e65de78e84 · report
get_last_layer elastufka/fm4astro/classifier_model.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · a4eaddefa2df529e · report
jpg_loader elastufka/fm4astro/fm_datasets.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 038de18b9aae0811 · report
norm_label elastufka/fm4astro/evaluator.py official repository ran fingerprinted GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 1291d15dae744bb4 · report
npy_loader elastufka/fm4astro/fm_datasets.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 797d7b61a53aa714 · report
resize_boxes elastufka/fm4astro/myGRCNNtransform.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · d0fdd2f3703ea795 · report
resize_keypoints elastufka/fm4astro/myGRCNNtransform.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 76024c7f5ea7c958 · report
train_and_eval_model elastufka/fm4astro/classifier_model.py official repository ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 4709fd173194e4ad · report
create_model elastufka/fm4astro/fasterrcnn_resnet18.py official repository unverified GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 0d4c7f84fc4fb4ad · report
freeze_ViT_blocks elastufka/fm4astro/train_frcnn.py official repository unverified GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 8ad5e131c9f9151f · report
transform elastufka/fm4astro/finetune.py official repository unverified GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 5549b6c9281cfcfe · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections