Papers › Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and...
Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learning
Takeru Miyato, Shin-ichi Maeda, Masanori Koyama, Shin Ishii
We propose a new regularization method based on virtual adversarial loss: a new measure of local smoothness of the conditional label distribution given input. Virtual adversarial loss is defined as the robustness of the conditional label distribution around each input data point against local perturbation. Unlike adversarial training, our method defines the adversarial direction without label information and is hence applicable to semi-supervised learning. Because the directions in which we smooth the model are only "virtually" adversarial, we call our method virtual adversarial training (VAT). The computational cost of VAT is relatively low. For neural networks, the approximated gradient of virtual adversarial loss can be computed with no more than two pairs of forward- and back-propagations. In our experiments, we applied VAT to supervised and semi-supervised learning tasks on multiple benchmark datasets. With a simple enhancement of the algorithm based on the entropy minimization principle, our VAT achieves state-of-the-art performance for semi-supervised learning tasks on SVHN and CIFAR-10.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1704.03976")
Code
Syntology Ran 11 of 13 code samples harvested from 6 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · violated contract; 5 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 13 samples from 6 repositories, 11 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
14 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
13 samples harvested; 11 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 11 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 6 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
8bf9288f27b1cdee · report
beee0131e9cc6d75 · report
03e3536d888d36f6 · report
195da81a35fac4c0 · report
8783f770c09f42c0 · report
e9ad1c524415f51a · report
a3bc3a948b4efb17 · report
086369d12e1ad6a7 · report
38eb87363cf326f2 · report
6a0687b01242a053 · report
5681c48489d856d1 · report
0b20deecf73f5d12 · report
cc264bc10208617d · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 250 Labels | VAT | Percentage error | 36.03 | #24 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels | VAT+EntMin | Percentage error | 10.55 | #41 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels | VAT | Percentage error | 11.36 | #43 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | SVHN, 1000 labels | VAT | Accuracy | 94.58 | #15 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | SVHN, 250 Labels | VAT | Accuracy | 91.59 | #13 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | cifar10, 250 Labels | VAT | Percentage correct | 63.97 | #4 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections