Papers › VideoGPT+: Integrating Image and Video Encoders for Enhanced Video Understanding

VideoGPT+: Integrating Image and Video Encoders for Enhanced Video Understanding

13 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.09418archive 2025-07-28

Muhammad Maaz, Hanoona Rasheed, Salman Khan, Fahad Khan

Building on the advances of language models, Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have contributed significant improvements in video understanding. While the current video LMMs utilize advanced Large Language Models (LLMs), they rely on either image or video encoders to process visual inputs, each of which has its own limitations. Image encoders excel at capturing rich spatial details from frame sequences but lack explicit temporal context, which can be important in videos with intricate action sequences. On the other hand, video encoders provide temporal context but are often limited by computational constraints that lead to processing only sparse frames at lower resolutions, resulting in reduced contextual and spatial understanding. To this end, we introduce VideoGPT+, which combines the complementary benefits of the image encoder (for detailed spatial understanding) and the video encoder (for global temporal context modeling). The model processes videos by dividing them into smaller segments and applies an adaptive pooling strategy on features extracted by both image and video encoders. Our architecture showcases improved performance across multiple video benchmarks, including VCGBench, MVBench and Zero-shot question-answering. Further, we develop 112K video-instruction set using a novel semi-automatic annotation pipeline which further improves the model performance. Additionally, to comprehensively evaluate video LMMs, we present VCGBench-Diverse, covering 18 broad video categories such as lifestyle, sports, science, gaming, and surveillance videos. This benchmark with 4,354 question-answer pairs evaluates the generalization of existing LMMs on dense video captioning, spatial and temporal understanding, and complex reasoning, ensuring comprehensive assessment across diverse video types and dynamics. Code: https://github.com/mbzuai-oryx/VideoGPT-plus.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2406.09418")

Code

Syntology Ran 6 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 6 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchCC-BY-4.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

6ran
2unverified

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

apply_adaptive_avg_pooling mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus/videogpt_plus/model/arch.py official repository ran CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · 3fc12acfa2e8e18e · report
eval_string mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus/videogpt_plus/model/internvideo/config.py official repository ran CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · c4af2e63b61c4766 · report
load_image_from_base64 mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus/videogpt_plus/mm_utils.py official repository ran CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · c3ee9d07c900dd55 · report
merge_a_into_b mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus/videogpt_plus/model/internvideo/config.py official repository ran CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · e41cae3b88c4eedd · report
process_images mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus/videogpt_plus/mm_utils.py official repository ran CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · 1df990c375318896 · report
uniform_sample mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus/videogpt_plus/model/dataloader.py official repository ran fingerprinted CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · 75fecde3bc752044 · report
eval_dict_leaf mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus/videogpt_plus/model/internvideo/config.py official repository unverified CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · 91bc1b8fd39b1a58 · report
load_pretrained_model mbzuai-oryx/videogpt-plus/videogpt_plus/model/builder.py official repository unverified CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · 3816500f658b87d1 · report

Tasks

Dense Video CaptioningQuestion AnsweringVCGBench-DiverseVideo CaptioningVideo Question AnsweringVideo UnderstandingVideo-based Generative Performance BenchmarkingVideo-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Consistency)Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Contextual Understanding)Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Correctness of Information)Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Detail Orientation))Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Temporal Understanding)Zero-Shot Video Question Answer

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

VCG+112K

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Consistency 2.59 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Contextual Understanding 2.81 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Correctness of Information 2.46 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Dense Captioning 1.38 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Detail Orientation 2.73 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Reasoning 3.63 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Spatial Understanding 2.80 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Temporal Understanding 1.78 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
VCGBench-Diverse VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ mean 2.47 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Video Question Answering MVBench VideoGPT+ Avg. 58.7 #10 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Video Question Answering TVBench VideoGPT+ Average Accuracy 41.7 #23 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Consistency 3.39 #7 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Contextual Understanding 3.74 #7 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Correctness of Information 3.27 #7 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Detail Orientation 3.18 #7 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ Temporal Understanding 2.83 #7 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ mean 3.28 #7 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Consistency) VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ gpt-score 3.39 #4 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Contextual Understanding) VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ gpt-score 3.74 #6 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Correctness of Information) VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ gpt-score 3.27 #6 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Detail Orientation)) VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ gpt-score 3.18 #3 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Video-based Generative Performance Benchmarking (Temporal Understanding) VideoInstruct VideoGPT+ gpt-score 2.83 #3 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer ActivityNet-QA VideoGPT+ Accuracy 50.6 #11 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer ActivityNet-QA VideoGPT+ Confidence Score 3.6 #11 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer MSRVTT-QA VideoGPT+ Accuracy 60.6 #12 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer MSRVTT-QA VideoGPT+ Confidence Score 3.6 #12 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer MSVD-QA VideoGPT+ Accuracy 72.4 #15 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer MSVD-QA VideoGPT+ Confidence Score 3.6 #15 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer TGIF-QA VideoGPT+ Accuracy 74.6 #7 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer TGIF-QA VideoGPT+ Confidence Score 4.1 #7 of 14 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

SET

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections