Papers › Variable selection with genetic algorithms using repeated cross-validation of PLS...
Variable selection with genetic algorithms using repeated cross-validation of PLS regression models as fitness measure
David Kepplinger, Peter Filzmoser, Kurt Varmuza
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Genetic algorithms are a widely used method in chemometrics for extracting variable subsets with high prediction power. Most fitness measures used by these genetic algorithms are based on the ordinary least-squares fit of the resulting model to the entire data or a subset thereof. Due to multicollinearity, partial least squares regression is often more appropriate, but rarely considered in genetic algorithms due to the additional cost for estimating the optimal number of components. We introduce two novel fitness measures for genetic algorithms, explicitly designed to estimate the internal prediction performance of partial least squares regression models built from the variable subsets. Both measures estimate the optimal number of components using cross-validation and subsequently estimate the prediction performance by predicting the response of observations not included in model-fitting. This is repeated multiple times to estimate the measures' variations due to different random splits. Moreover, one measure was optimized for speed and more accurate estimation of the prediction performance for observations not included during variable selection. This leads to variable subsets with high internal and external prediction power. Results on high-dimensional chemical-analytical data show that the variable subsets acquired by this approach have competitive internal prediction power and superior external prediction power compared to variable subsets extracted with other fitness measures.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections